These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33378837)

  • 41. Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1518-32. PubMed ID: 15050576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. How facial attractiveness affects sustained attention.
    Li J; Oksama L; Hyönä J
    Scand J Psychol; 2016 Oct; 57(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 27347672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Similar distraction, but differential suppression, for faces and non-face objects: Evidence from behaviour and event-related potentials.
    Neumann MF; Viska CG; van Huis S; Palermo R
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Nov; 139():39-46. PubMed ID: 30292783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Different processes in attractiveness assessments for unattractive and highly attractive faces-The role of presentation duration and rotation.
    Stróżak P; Zielińska M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Sep; 200():102946. PubMed ID: 31693937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Hello handsome! Male's facial attractiveness gives rise to female's fairness bias in Ultimatum Game scenarios-An ERP study.
    Ma Q; Qian D; Hu L; Wang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180459. PubMed ID: 28678888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The role of horizontal facial structure on the N170 and N250.
    Hashemi A; Pachai MV; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    Vision Res; 2019 Apr; 157():12-23. PubMed ID: 29555299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Social categorization modulates own-age bias in face recognition and ERP correlates of face processing.
    Rollins L; Olsen A; Evans M
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Apr; 141():107417. PubMed ID: 32135182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Facial attractiveness biases the perception of eye contact.
    Kloth N; Altmann CS; Schweinberger SR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):1906-18. PubMed ID: 21756185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Decreased spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces in male patients with chronic schizophrenia.
    Obayashi C; Nakashima T; Onitsuka T; Maekawa T; Hirano Y; Hirano S; Oribe N; Kaneko K; Kanba S; Tobimatsu S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Aug; 120(8):1525-33. PubMed ID: 19632149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Hyperthermia exposure impaired the early stage of face recognition: an ERP study.
    Sun G; Li M; Yang Z; Li L; Jiang Q; Zhao L
    Int J Hyperthermia; 2012; 28(7):605-20. PubMed ID: 23017061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The "cheerleader effect" in facial and bodily attractiveness: A result of memory bias and not perceptual encoding.
    Hsieh JY; Gwinn OS; Brooks KR; Stephen ID; Carragher DJ; Nicholls ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 May; 74(5):972-980. PubMed ID: 33174508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Structural encoding processes contribute to individual differences in face and object cognition: Inferences from psychometric test performance and event-related brain potentials.
    Nowparast Rostami H; Sommer W; Zhou C; Wilhelm O; Hildebrandt A
    Cortex; 2017 Oct; 95():192-210. PubMed ID: 28915366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Weak encoding of faces predicts socially influenced judgments of facial attractiveness.
    Schnuerch R; Koppehele-Gossel J; Gibbons H
    Soc Neurosci; 2015; 10(6):624-34. PubMed ID: 25719443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Impaired perceptual processing of facial expression categorization in social anhedonia.
    Nie L; Zhou S; Wang Z; Wang M; Wang Y; Zheng Y
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Dec; 57(12):e13682. PubMed ID: 32940368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Abnormalities in early visual processes are linked to hypersociability and atypical evaluation of facial trustworthiness: An ERP study with Williams syndrome.
    Shore DM; Ng R; Bellugi U; Mills DL
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 17(5):1002-1017. PubMed ID: 28685402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Investigation of effects of face rotation on race processing: an ERPs study.
    Montalan B; Veujoz M; Boitout A; Leleu A; Camus O; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Apr; 81(3):360-9. PubMed ID: 23369846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Multisensory stimulation modulates perceptual and post perceptual face representations: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Estudillo AJ; Kaufmann JM; Bindemann M; Schweinberger SR
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 48(5):2259-2271. PubMed ID: 30107052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Unattractive faces are more attractive when the bottom-half is masked, an effect that reverses when the top-half is concealed.
    Pazhoohi F; Kingstone A
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Jan; 7(1):6. PubMed ID: 35072804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Attractive memory: High destination memory for attractive faces.
    El Haj M; Ndobo A
    Scand J Psychol; 2021 Feb; 62(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 32613619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Is neural adaptation of the N170 category-specific? Effects of adaptor stimulus duration and interstimulus interval.
    Feuerriegel D; Churches OF; Keage HA
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Apr; 96(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 25746937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.