These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33379900)

  • 1. Individual variability in auditory feedback processing: Responses to real-time formant perturbations and their relation to perceptual acuity.
    Nault DR; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Dec; 148(6):3709. PubMed ID: 33379900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perturbing the consistency of auditory feedback in speech.
    Nault DR; Mitsuya T; Purcell DW; Munhall KG
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():905365. PubMed ID: 36092651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response patterns to vowel formant perturbations in children.
    Cheung ST; Thompson K; Chen JL; Yunusova Y; Beal DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Oct; 150(4):2647. PubMed ID: 34717445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compensatory Responses to Formant Perturbations Proportionally Decrease as Perturbations Increase.
    Daliri A; Chao SC; Fitzgerald LC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Oct; 63(10):3392-3407. PubMed ID: 32976078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intact Correction for Self-Produced Vowel Formant Variability in Individuals With Cerebellar Ataxia Regardless of Auditory Feedback Availability.
    Parrell B; Ivry RB; Nagarajan SS; Houde JF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Jun; 64(6S):2234-2247. PubMed ID: 33900786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech compensation responses and sensorimotor adaptation to formant feedback perturbations.
    Raharjo I; Kothare H; Nagarajan SS; Houde JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):1147. PubMed ID: 33639824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does pre-speech auditory modulation reflect processes related to feedback monitoring or speech movement planning?
    Li JJ; Daliri A; Kim KS; Max L
    bioRxiv; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39026879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensorimotor control of vocal pitch and formant frequencies in Parkinson's disease.
    Mollaei F; Shiller DM; Baum SR; Gracco VL
    Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 1646():269-277. PubMed ID: 27288701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Compensations in response to real-time formant perturbations of different magnitudes.
    MacDonald EN; Goldberg R; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):1059-68. PubMed ID: 20136227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Articulatory compensation for low-pass filtered formant-altered auditory feedback.
    Uezu Y; Hiroya S; Mochida T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Jul; 150(1):64. PubMed ID: 34340472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probing the independence of formant control using altered auditory feedback.
    MacDonald EN; Purcell DW; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):955-65. PubMed ID: 21361452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responses to Auditory Feedback Manipulations in Speech May Be Affected by Previous Exposure to Auditory Errors.
    Niziolek CA; Parrell B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Jun; 64(6S):2169-2181. PubMed ID: 33705674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of the loss of auditory feedback on segmental parameters of vowels of postlingually deafened speakers.
    Schenk BS; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2003 Dec; 30(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 14656557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vowel formant discrimination for high-fidelity speech.
    Liu C; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1224-33. PubMed ID: 15376687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consistency influences altered auditory feedback processing.
    Franken MK; Acheson DJ; McQueen JM; Hagoort P; Eisner F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2371-2379. PubMed ID: 30836818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of coarticulatory and phonemic relations on individual compensatory formant production.
    Klein E; Brunner J; Hoole P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Aug; 146(2):1265. PubMed ID: 31472573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal malleability to auditory feedback perturbation is modulated by rhythmic abilities and auditory acuity.
    Oschkinat M; Hoole P; Falk S; Dalla Bella S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():885074. PubMed ID: 36188179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An investigation of vowel organization in speakers with severe and profound hearing loss.
    McCaffrey HA; Sussman HM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Aug; 37(4):938-51. PubMed ID: 7967578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of Persian Vowel Production in Hearing-Impaired Children Using a Cochlear Implant and Normal-Hearing Children.
    Jafari N; Drinnan M; Mohamadi R; Yadegari F; Nourbakhsh M; Torabinezhad F
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 25990321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.