These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33380615)

  • 1. The insertion loss distribution function of an ear plug, and its implications for the ear plug acceptability.
    Lenzuni P; Annesi D; Nataletti P
    Noise Health; 2020; 22(105):35-45. PubMed ID: 33380615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
    Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring earplug noise attenuation: A comparison of laboratory and field methods.
    Karch SJ; Federman J; Ginsberg JT; Qureshi I
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2024 Jan; 21(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 37843505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing Protector Attenuation and Noise Exposure Among Metal Manufacturing Workers.
    Sayler SK; Rabinowitz PM; Galusha D; Sun K; Neitzel RL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):680-689. PubMed ID: 30157082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
    Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Training on hearing protector insertion improves noise attenuation.
    Samelli AG; Rocha CH; Theodósio P; Moreira RR; Neves-Lobo IF
    Codas; 2015; 27(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 26691614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An investigation of the adjustment of retrospective noise exposure for use of hearing protection devices.
    Sbihi H; Teschke K; MacNab YC; Davies HW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 20237208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
    Tikka C; Verbeek JH; Kateman E; Morata TC; Dreschler WA; Ferrite S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 7(7):CD006396. PubMed ID: 28685503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube.
    Murphy WJ; Fackler CJ; Berger EH; Shaw PB; Stergar M
    Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):364-73. PubMed ID: 26356380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of physiological noise and the occlusion effect on the measurement of real-ear attenuation at threshold.
    Berger EH; Kerivan JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jul; 74(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 6886201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spectral analysis of hearing protector impulsive insertion loss.
    Fackler CJ; Berger EH; Murphy WJ; Stergar ME
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup1):13-21. PubMed ID: 27885881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices.
    Berger EH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jun; 79(6):1655-87. PubMed ID: 3522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A controlled investigation of in-field attenuation performance of selected insert, earmuff, and canal cap hearing protectors.
    Park MY; Casali JG
    Hum Factors; 1991 Dec; 33(6):693-714. PubMed ID: 1800294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers.
    Neitzel R; Seixas N
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15788384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual fit testing of hearing protection devices.
    Voix J; Hager LD
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 19534854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audiometric studies versus predictions of drastic deteriorations of hearing protectors' noise attenuation due to reduced wearing time: Misjudgments by standards based on the energy-equivalence principle.
    Strasser H; Müller O; Irle H
    Work; 2015; 51(4):757-70. PubMed ID: 26409946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Earmuff efficacy in the workplace using F-MIRE - a case report.
    Gomes RF; Samelli AG; Bistafa SR
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2018 Dec; 24(4):577-581. PubMed ID: 28776454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.