219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33381824)
1. New mixture models for decoy-free false discovery rate estimation in mass spectrometry proteomics.
Peng Y; Jain S; Li YF; Greguš M; Ivanov AR; Vitek O; Radivojac P
Bioinformatics; 2020 Dec; 36(Suppl_2):i745-i753. PubMed ID: 33381824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modeling Lower-Order Statistics to Enable Decoy-Free FDR Estimation in Proteomics.
Madej D; Lam H
J Proteome Res; 2023 Apr; 22(4):1159-1171. PubMed ID: 36962508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Common Decoy Distributions Simplify False Discovery Rate Estimation in Shotgun Proteomics.
Madej D; Wu L; Lam H
J Proteome Res; 2022 Feb; 21(2):339-348. PubMed ID: 34989576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. False discovery rate estimation using candidate peptides for each spectrum.
Lee S; Park H; Kim H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):454. PubMed ID: 36319948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Decoy methods for assessing false positives and false discovery rates in shotgun proteomics.
Wang G; Wu WW; Zhang Z; Masilamani S; Shen RF
Anal Chem; 2009 Jan; 81(1):146-59. PubMed ID: 19061407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality Control for the Target Decoy Approach for Peptide Identification.
Debrie E; Malfait M; Gabriels R; Declerq A; Sticker A; Martens L; Clement L
J Proteome Res; 2023 Feb; 22(2):350-358. PubMed ID: 36648107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Challenges in Peptide-Spectrum Matching: A Robust and Reproducible Statistical Framework for Removing Low-Accuracy, High-Scoring Hits.
Hubler SL; Kumar P; Mehta S; Easterly C; Johnson JE; Jagtap PD; Griffin TJ
J Proteome Res; 2020 Jan; 19(1):161-173. PubMed ID: 31793300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Unbiased False Discovery Rate Estimation for Shotgun Proteomics Based on the Target-Decoy Approach.
Levitsky LI; Ivanov MV; Lobas AA; Gorshkov MV
J Proteome Res; 2017 Feb; 16(2):393-397. PubMed ID: 27959540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeat-Preserving Decoy Database for False Discovery Rate Estimation in Peptide Identification.
Moosa JM; Guan S; Moran MF; Ma B
J Proteome Res; 2020 Mar; 19(3):1029-1036. PubMed ID: 32009416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Challenging Targets or Describing Mismatches? A Comment on Common Decoy Distribution by Madej et al.
Etourneau L; Burger T
J Proteome Res; 2022 Dec; 21(12):2840-2845. PubMed ID: 36305797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved False Discovery Rate Estimation Procedure for Shotgun Proteomics.
Keich U; Kertesz-Farkas A; Noble WS
J Proteome Res; 2015 Aug; 14(8):3148-61. PubMed ID: 26152888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving Peptide-Level Mass Spectrometry Analysis via Double Competition.
Lin A; Short T; Noble WS; Keich U
J Proteome Res; 2022 Oct; 21(10):2412-2420. PubMed ID: 36166314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Large Scale Mass Spectrometry-based Identifications of Enzyme-mediated Protein Methylation Are Subject to High False Discovery Rates.
Hart-Smith G; Yagoub D; Tay AP; Pickford R; Wilkins MR
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2016 Mar; 15(3):989-1006. PubMed ID: 26699799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transfer posterior error probability estimation for peptide identification.
Yi X; Gong F; Fu Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 May; 21(1):173. PubMed ID: 32366221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-dimensional target decoy strategy for shotgun proteomics.
Bern MW; Kil YJ
J Proteome Res; 2011 Dec; 10(12):5296-301. PubMed ID: 22010998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving X!Tandem on peptide identification from mass spectrometry by self-boosted Percolator.
Yang P; Ma J; Wang P; Zhu Y; Zhou BB; Yang YH
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(5):1273-80. PubMed ID: 22689082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Empirical multidimensional space for scoring peptide spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics.
Ivanov MV; Levitsky LI; Lobas AA; Panic T; Laskay ÜA; Mitulovic G; Schmid R; Pridatchenko ML; Tsybin YO; Gorshkov MV
J Proteome Res; 2014 Apr; 13(4):1911-20. PubMed ID: 24571493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MUMAL: multivariate analysis in shotgun proteomics using machine learning techniques.
Cerqueira FR; Ferreira RS; Oliveira AP; Gomes AP; Ramos HJ; Graber A; Baumgartner C
BMC Genomics; 2012; 13 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S4. PubMed ID: 23095859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reverse and Random Decoy Methods for False Discovery Rate Estimation in High Mass Accuracy Peptide Spectral Library Searches.
Zhang Z; Burke M; Mirokhin YA; Tchekhovskoi DV; Markey SP; Yu W; Chaerkady R; Hess S; Stein SE
J Proteome Res; 2018 Feb; 17(2):846-857. PubMed ID: 29281288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Target-decoy approach and false discovery rate: when things may go wrong.
Gupta N; Bandeira N; Keich U; Pevzner PA
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2011 Jul; 22(7):1111-20. PubMed ID: 21953092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
