These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33381846)

  • 1. Exploring chromatin conformation and gene co-expression through graph embedding.
    Varrone M; Nanni L; Ciriello G; Ceri S
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Dec; 36(Suppl_2):i700-i708. PubMed ID: 33381846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of gene co-expression from chromatin contacts with graph attention network.
    Zhang K; Wang C; Sun L; Zheng J
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Sep; 38(19):4457-4465. PubMed ID: 35929807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GenomeDISCO: a concordance score for chromosome conformation capture experiments using random walks on contact map graphs.
    Ursu O; Boley N; Taranova M; Wang YXR; Yardimci GG; Stafford Noble W; Kundaje A
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Aug; 34(16):2701-2707. PubMed ID: 29554289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrative chromatin domain annotation through graph embedding of Hi-C data.
    Shokraneh N; Arab M; Libbrecht M
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 36534827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. hicGAN infers super resolution Hi-C data with generative adversarial networks.
    Liu Q; Lv H; Jiang R
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Jul; 35(14):i99-i107. PubMed ID: 31510693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chromatin accessibility prediction via convolutional long short-term memory networks with k-mer embedding.
    Min X; Zeng W; Chen N; Chen T; Jiang R
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 33(14):i92-i101. PubMed ID: 28881969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advantages of using graph databases to explore chromatin conformation capture experiments.
    D'Agostino D; Liò P; Aldinucci M; Merelli I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Apr; 22(Suppl 2):43. PubMed ID: 33902433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EnHiC: learning fine-resolution Hi-C contact maps using a generative adversarial framework.
    Hu Y; Ma W
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Jul; 37(Suppl_1):i272-i279. PubMed ID: 34252966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. multiHiCcompare: joint normalization and comparative analysis of complex Hi-C experiments.
    Stansfield JC; Cresswell KG; Dozmorov MG
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Sep; 35(17):2916-2923. PubMed ID: 30668639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hi-C Chromatin Interaction Networks Predict Co-expression in the Mouse Cortex.
    Babaei S; Mahfouz A; Hulsman M; Lelieveldt BP; de Ridder J; Reinders M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 May; 11(5):e1004221. PubMed ID: 25965262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. HiCARN: resolution enhancement of Hi-C data using cascading residual networks.
    Hicks P; Oluwadare O
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Apr; 38(9):2414-2421. PubMed ID: 35274679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hierarchical block matrices as efficient representations of chromosome topologies and their application for 3C data integration.
    Shavit Y; Walker BJ; Lio' P
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 32(8):1121-9. PubMed ID: 26685310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of copy number variations and translocations in cancer cells from Hi-C data.
    Chakraborty A; Ay F
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 34(2):338-345. PubMed ID: 29048467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. BART3D: inferring transcriptional regulators associated with differential chromatin interactions from Hi-C data.
    Wang Z; Zhang Y; Zang C
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Sep; 37(18):3075-3078. PubMed ID: 33720325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An integrative approach for fine-mapping chromatin interactions.
    Jaroszewicz A; Ernst J
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1704-1711. PubMed ID: 31742318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extending partial haplotypes to full genome haplotypes using chromosome conformation capture data.
    Ben-Elazar S; Chor B; Yakhini Z
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 32(17):i559-i566. PubMed ID: 27587675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. HiTea: a computational pipeline to identify non-reference transposable element insertions in Hi-C data.
    Jain D; Chu C; Alver BH; Lee S; Lee EA; Park PJ
    Bioinformatics; 2021 May; 37(8):1045-1051. PubMed ID: 33136153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FastHiC: a fast and accurate algorithm to detect long-range chromosomal interactions from Hi-C data.
    Xu Z; Zhang G; Wu C; Li Y; Hu M
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 32(17):2692-5. PubMed ID: 27153668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benchmark of software tools for prokaryotic chromosomal interaction domain identification.
    Magnitov MD; Kuznetsova VS; Ulianov SV; Razin SV; Tyakht AV
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Nov; 36(17):4560-4567. PubMed ID: 32492116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Graph rigidity reveals well-constrained regions of chromosome conformation embeddings.
    Duggal G; Kingsford C
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 13():241. PubMed ID: 22998471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.