392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33382616)
1. Conformational Preferences of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein Domain: A Case Study for Modern Force Fields.
Gopal SM; Wingbermühle S; Schnatwinkel J; Juber S; Herrmann C; Schäfer LV
J Phys Chem B; 2021 Jan; 125(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 33382616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Probing the functional conformations of an atypical proline-rich fusion peptide.
Dutta N; Dutta Chowdhury S; Lahiri A
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2019 Sep; 21(37):20727-20742. PubMed ID: 31509121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting molecular properties of α-synuclein using force fields for intrinsically disordered proteins.
Pedersen KB; Flores-Canales JC; Schiøtt B
Proteins; 2023 Jan; 91(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 35950933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Molecular dynamics simulations of the adsorption of an intrinsically disordered protein: Force field and water model evaluation in comparison with experiments.
Koder Hamid M; Månsson LK; Meklesh V; Persson P; Skepö M
Front Mol Biosci; 2022; 9():958175. PubMed ID: 36387274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of force fields on the conformational and dynamic properties of amyloid β(1-40) dimer explored by replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations.
Watts CR; Gregory A; Frisbie C; Lovas S
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86(3):279-300. PubMed ID: 29235155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. General Purpose Water Model Can Improve Atomistic Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Shabane PS; Izadi S; Onufriev AV
J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Apr; 15(4):2620-2634. PubMed ID: 30865832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conformational propensities of intrinsically disordered proteins influence the mechanism of binding and folding.
Arai M; Sugase K; Dyson HJ; Wright PE
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Aug; 112(31):9614-9. PubMed ID: 26195786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Phosphorylated Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: A Force Field Comparison.
Rieloff E; Skepö M
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Sep; 22(18):. PubMed ID: 34576338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Molecular Dynamics Simulations Combined with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and/or Small-Angle X-ray Scattering Data for Characterizing Intrinsically Disordered Protein Conformational Ensembles.
Chan-Yao-Chong M; Durand D; Ha-Duong T
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 May; 59(5):1743-1758. PubMed ID: 30840442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Balanced Solvent Model for Intrinsically Disordered and Ordered Proteins.
Mu J; Pan Z; Chen HF
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Oct; 61(10):5141-5151. PubMed ID: 34546059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of electrostatic interactions in binding of peptides and intrinsically disordered proteins to their folded targets. 1. NMR and MD characterization of the complex between the c-Crk N-SH3 domain and the peptide Sos.
Xue Y; Yuwen T; Zhu F; Skrynnikov NR
Biochemistry; 2014 Oct; 53(41):6473-95. PubMed ID: 25207671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison and Evaluation of Force Fields for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Rahman MU; Rehman AU; Liu H; Chen HF
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Oct; 60(10):4912-4923. PubMed ID: 32816485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic Differences between Current Molecular Dynamics Force Fields To Represent Local Properties of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Yu L; Li DW; Brüschweiler R
J Phys Chem B; 2021 Jan; 125(3):798-804. PubMed ID: 33444020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conformation Dynamics of the Intrinsically Disordered Protein c-Myb with the
Guo X; Han J; Luo R; Chen HF
RSC Adv; 2017; 7(47):29713-29721. PubMed ID: 29104751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing Protein-Solvent Force Fields to Reproduce Intrinsic Conformational Preferences of Model Peptides.
Nerenberg PS; Head-Gordon T
J Chem Theory Comput; 2011 Apr; 7(4):1220-30. PubMed ID: 26606367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Force Field Benchmark of Amino Acids: I. Hydration and Diffusion in Different Water Models.
Zhang H; Yin C; Jiang Y; van der Spoel D
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 May; 58(5):1037-1052. PubMed ID: 29648448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Choice of Force Field for Proteins Containing Structured and Intrinsically Disordered Regions.
Zapletal V; Mládek A; Melková K; Louša P; Nomilner E; Jaseňáková Z; Kubáň V; Makovická M; Laníková A; Žídek L; Hritz J
Biophys J; 2020 Apr; 118(7):1621-1633. PubMed ID: 32367806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Force Field Effects in Simulations of Flexible Peptides with Varying Polyproline II Propensity.
Jephthah S; Pesce F; Lindorff-Larsen K; Skepö M
J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Oct; 17(10):6634-6646. PubMed ID: 34524800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Structural Characterization of N-WASP Domain V Using MD Simulations with NMR and SAXS Data.
Chan-Yao-Chong M; Deville C; Pinet L; van Heijenoort C; Durand D; Ha-Duong T
Biophys J; 2019 Apr; 116(7):1216-1227. PubMed ID: 30878202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: On the Accuracy of the TIP4P-D Water Model and the Representativeness of Protein Disorder Models.
Henriques J; Skepö M
J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Jul; 12(7):3407-15. PubMed ID: 27243806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
