These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 333828)

  • 1. [Experiences with the API 20A system in routine species identification of anaerobes (author's transl)].
    Essers L; Haralambie E
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1977 Jul; 238(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 333828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of anaerobes on the Minitek System, compared to a conventional system.
    Holloway Y; Dankert J
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1979; 245(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 44787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three procedures for biochemical testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Moore HB; Sutter VL; Finegold SM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1975 Jan; 1(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 1176590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of API and Minitek to Center for Disease Control methods for the biochemical characterization of anaerobes.
    Hansen SL; Stewart BJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Sep; 4(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Minitec and API as rapid diagnostic methods for anaerobic bacteria.
    Bergan T; Vangdal M; Salveson A
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1984; 91():103-11. PubMed ID: 6377470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic bottle to the isolator tube, BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle, and BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle and comparison of the BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle to the Isolator tube for recovery of bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi from blood.
    Vetter E; Torgerson C; Feuker A; Hughes J; Harmsen S; Schleck C; Horstmeier C; Roberts G; Cockerill F
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Dec; 39(12):4380-6. PubMed ID: 11724848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A method for routine identification of anaerobic bacteria, in particular of non-sporogenic forms (author's transl)].
    Lodenkämper H; Rühlcke U
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1975 Aug; 232(4):554-63. PubMed ID: 1106065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anaerobic identification systems.
    Rosenblatt JE
    Clin Lab Med; 1985 Mar; 5(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 4017512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [115 strains of anaerobic gram positive cocci. I. Comparative study of the conventional method and use of anaerobes API-20 in the identification of anaerobic gram positive cocci].
    López Bartolomé O; Berzosa A; Bertiu C; Cour I
    Rev Clin Esp; 1980 Jul; 157(5):333-6. PubMed ID: 6996047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of API-10s and Minitek with conventional biochemical tests (author's transl)].
    Stanek G; Hirschl A; Rotter M
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Feb; 246(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 6999781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods.
    Izard D; Savage C; Enayeh E; Leclerc H; Troonen H
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of PRAS II, RapID ANA, and API 20A systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Karachewski NO; Busch EL; Wells CL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jan; 21(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 3881468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Isolation and classification of anaerobic bacteria from pulp cavities of nonvital teeth in man.
    Hirai K; Tagami A; Okuda K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1991 Aug; 32(3):95-8. PubMed ID: 1819449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The fecal flora of man. IV. Communication: Comparison of the newly developed method with the old conventional method for the analysis of intestinal flora (author's transl)].
    Mitsuoka T; Ohno K; Benno Y; Suzuki K; Namba K
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1976 Mar; 234(2):219-33. PubMed ID: 775864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effect of anaerobiosis in 6 blood-culture media on the recovery rate of aerobic microorganisms (author's transl)].
    Abdou MA; Schmitz M
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1981 Dec; 251(2):248-62. PubMed ID: 6803474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification and susceptibility testing for obligate anaerobic bacteria using a semi-automated API ATB plus system.
    Grollier G; Burucoa C; Bonnin M; de Rautlin de La Roy Y
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1992; 50(6-7):393-7. PubMed ID: 1492717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of the sensitivity of Haemophilus to antibiotics by the modified API-ATB system].
    Bourlioux P; Rosenau A; Perdiz M
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1985 Jun; 33(5 Pt 2):557-63. PubMed ID: 3911154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of a simple, rapid procedure for the presumptive identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Holland JW; Gagnet SM; Lewis SA; Stauffer LR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1977 Apr; 5(4):416-26. PubMed ID: 323283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of bacteria from clinical samples using Bartonella alpha-Proteobacteria growth medium.
    Cadenas MB; Maggi RG; Diniz PP; Breitschwerdt KT; Sontakke S; Breithschwerdt EB
    J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Nov; 71(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 17889384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anaerobic bag culture method.
    Rosenblatt JE; Stewart PR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1975 Jun; 1(6):527-30. PubMed ID: 1100671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.