284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33384248)
1. An Assessment of Different Praat Versions for Acoustic Measures Analyzed Automatically by VoiceEvalU8 and Manually by Two Raters.
Grillo EU; Wolfberg J
J Voice; 2023 Jan; 37(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 33384248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting Voice Disorder Status From Smoothed Measures of Cepstral Peak Prominence Using Praat and Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV).
Sauder C; Bretl M; Eadie T
J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):557-566. PubMed ID: 28169094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fundamental Frequency and Intensity Effects on Cepstral Measures in Vowels from Connected Speech of Speakers with Voice Disorders.
Sampaio MC; Bohlender JE; Brockmann-Bauser M
J Voice; 2021 May; 35(3):422-431. PubMed ID: 31883852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Vocal Intensity and Fundamental Frequency on Cepstral Peak Prominence in Patients with Voice Disorders and Vocally Healthy Controls.
Brockmann-Bauser M; Van Stan JH; Carvalho Sampaio M; Bohlender JE; Hillman RE; Mehta DD
J Voice; 2021 May; 35(3):411-417. PubMed ID: 31859213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Objective dysphonia measures in the program Praat: smoothed cepstral peak prominence and acoustic voice quality index.
Maryn Y; Weenink D
J Voice; 2015 Jan; 29(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 25499526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
Jannetts S; Lowit A
J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparison of Cepstral Peak Prominence Measures From Two Acoustic Analysis Programs.
Watts CR; Awan SN; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):387.e1-387.e10. PubMed ID: 27751661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPP) Voice Analysis in Iranian Post-lingual Deaf Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Aghaei F; Khoramshahi H; Zamani P; Dehqan A; Hesam S
J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):795.e11-795.e20. PubMed ID: 34857450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Acoustic Analyses of Voice in Nonoptimized Conditions.
van der Woerd B; Wu M; Parsa V; Doyle PC; Fung K
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):3991-3999. PubMed ID: 33186510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Voice Acoustic Parameters as Predictors of Depression.
Silva WJ; Lopes L; Galdino MKC; Almeida AA
J Voice; 2024 Jan; 38(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 34353686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of Fundamental Frequency, Vocal Intensity, Sample Duration, and Vowel Context in Cepstral and Spectral Measures of Dysphonic Voices.
Sampaio M; Vaz Masson ML; de Paula Soares MF; Bohlender JE; Brockmann-Bauser M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 May; 63(5):1326-1339. PubMed ID: 32348195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences and Reliability of Linear and Nonlinear Acoustic Measures as a Function of Vocal Intensity in Individuals With Voice Disorders.
de Oliveira Florencio V; Almeida AA; Balata P; Nascimento S; Brockmann-Bauser M; Lopes LW
J Voice; 2023 Sep; 37(5):663-681. PubMed ID: 34116889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cepstral analysis of normal and pathological voice in Spanish adults. Smoothed cepstral peak prominence in sustained vowels versus connected speech.
Delgado-Hernández J; León-Gómez NM; Izquierdo-Arteaga LM; Llanos-Fumero Y
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2018; 69(3):134-140. PubMed ID: 28867553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the measures of cepstral peak prominence as a measure of dysphonia severity in Spanish-speaking subjects.
Núñez-Batalla F; Cartón-Corona N; Vasile G; García-Cabo P; Fernández-Vañes L; Llorente-Pendás JL
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2019; 70(4):222-228. PubMed ID: 30097163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acoustic Effects of Vocal Warm-Up: A 7-Week Longitudinal Case Study.
Castillo-Allendes A; Cantor-Cutiva LC; Hunter EJ
J Voice; 2024 Mar; 38(2):458-465. PubMed ID: 34844825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cepstral and Perceptual Investigations in Female Teachers With Functionally Healthy Voice.
Phadke KV; Laukkanen AM; Ilomäki I; Kankare E; Geneid A; Švec JG
J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):485.e33-485.e43. PubMed ID: 30342798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acoustic Perturbation Measures Improve with Increasing Vocal Intensity in Individuals With and Without Voice Disorders.
Brockmann-Bauser M; Bohlender JE; Mehta DD
J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 28528786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Voice outcomes after transoral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer-considering signal type and smoothed cepstral peak prominence.
Stone D; McCabe P; Palme CE; Heard R; Eastwood C; Riffat F; Madill C
J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):370-81. PubMed ID: 25301299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vocal Changes of Men and Women from Different Age Decades: An Analysis from 30 Years of Age.
Oliveira Santos A; Godoy J; Silverio K; Brasolotto A
J Voice; 2023 Nov; 37(6):840-850. PubMed ID: 34284927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mean fundamental frequency in connected speech and sustained vowel with and without a sentence-frame.
Iwarsson J; Hollen Nielsen R; Næs J
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2020 Jul; 45(2):91-96. PubMed ID: 31407616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
