These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33385132)
1. The effect of contextual information on decision-making in forensic toxicology. Hamnett HJ; Dror IE Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2020; 2():339-348. PubMed ID: 33385132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contextual bias on decision-making in forensic toxicology: First survey from China. He N; Wang L; Hao H Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Apr; 333():111232. PubMed ID: 35176676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of contextual information in forensic toxicology: An international survey of toxicologists' experiences. Hamnett HJ; Jack RE Sci Justice; 2019 Jul; 59(4):380-389. PubMed ID: 31256809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contextual bias in forensic toxicology decisions: A follow-up empirical study from China. He N; Hao H J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jul; 69(4):1400-1406. PubMed ID: 38567838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The biasing impact of irrelevant contextual information on forensic odontology radiograph matching decisions. Chiam SL; Dror IE; Huber CD; Higgins D Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Oct; 327():110997. PubMed ID: 34536753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis. Pena MM; Stoiloff S; Sparacino M; Schreiber Compo N J Forensic Sci; 2024 Sep; 69(5):1740-1757. PubMed ID: 38922874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decisions: A Review and Outlook. Curley LJ; Munro J; Lages M; MacLean R; Murray J J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):354-360. PubMed ID: 31693180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contextual bias by Forensic Document Examination trainees: An empirical study from China. He N; Hao H Sci Justice; 2024 Jul; 64(4):360-366. PubMed ID: 39025561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Forensic Confirmation Bias: Do Jurors Discount Examiners Who Were Exposed to Task-Irrelevant Information?* Kukucka J; Hiley A; Kassin SM J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1978-1990. PubMed ID: 32790911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What do forensic analysts consider relevant to their decision making? Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Dror IE Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 31472796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Strengthening forensic DNA decision making through a better understanding of the influence of cognitive bias. Jeanguenat AM; Budowle B; Dror IE Sci Justice; 2017 Nov; 57(6):415-420. PubMed ID: 29173454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A global survey of the attitudes and perspectives of cognitive bias in forensic anthropology. Leung KN; Nakhaeizadeh S; Morgan RM Sci Justice; 2024 Jul; 64(4):347-359. PubMed ID: 39025560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How Cross-Examination on Subjectivity and Bias Affects Jurors' Evaluations of Forensic Science Evidence. Thompson WC; Scurich N J Forensic Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(5):1379-1388. PubMed ID: 30791101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contextual information in medicolegal death investigation decision-making: Manner of death determination for cases of a single gunshot wound. Dror IE; Wolf DA; Phillips G; Gao S; Yang Y; Drake SA Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 5():100285. PubMed ID: 36569579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]