These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33385463)

  • 1. Efficacy and histologic accuracy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large (>20 mm) colorectal polyps: a comparative review and meta-analysis.
    Chandan S; Khan SR; Kumar A; Mohan BP; Ramai D; Kassab LL; Draganov PV; Othman MO; Kochhar GS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Sep; 94(3):471-482.e9. PubMed ID: 33385463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Higher rate of en bloc resection with underwater than conventional endoscopic mucosal resection: A meta-analysis.
    Tziatzios G; Gkolfakis P; Triantafyllou K; Fuccio L; Facciorusso A; Papanikolaou IS; Antonelli G; Nagl S; Ebigbo A; Probst A; Hassan C; Messmann H
    Dig Liver Dis; 2021 Aug; 53(8):958-964. PubMed ID: 34059445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety and efficacy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
    Chandan S; Bapaye J; Khan SR; Mohan BP; Ramai D; Dahiya DS; Bilal M; Draganov PV; Othman MO; Rodriguez Sánchez J; Kochhar GS
    Endosc Int Open; 2023 Aug; 11(8):E768-E777. PubMed ID: 37593155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting
    Zhang XQ; Sang JZ; Xu L; Mao XL; Li B; Zhu WL; Yang XY; Yu CH
    World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 28(45):6397-6409. PubMed ID: 36533110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.
    Schenck RJ; Jahann DA; Patrie JT; Stelow EB; Cox DG; Uppal DS; Sauer BG; Shami VM; Strand DS; Wang AY
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4174-4183. PubMed ID: 28342125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative efficacy and safety of resection techniques for treating 6 to 20mm, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Tziatzios G; Papaefthymiou A; Facciorusso A; Papanikolaou IS; Antonelli G; Marco S; Frazzoni L; Fuccio L; Paraskeva KD; Hassan C; Repici A; Sharma P; Rex DK; Triantafyllou K; Messmann H; Gkolfakis P
    Dig Liver Dis; 2023 Jul; 55(7):856-864. PubMed ID: 36336608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cold snare endoscopic resection of nonpedunculated colorectal polyps larger than 10 mm: a systematic review and pooled-analysis.
    Thoguluva Chandrasekar V; Spadaccini M; Aziz M; Maselli R; Hassan S; Fuccio L; Duvvuri A; Frazzoni L; Desai M; Fugazza A; Jegadeesan R; Colombo M; Dasari CS; Hassan C; Sharma P; Repici A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 May; 89(5):929-936.e3. PubMed ID: 30639542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection of Sessile Serrated Polyps 10 mm or Larger: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Thoguluva Chandrasekar V; Aziz M; Patel HK; Sidhu N; Duvvuri A; Dasari C; Kennedy KF; Ashwath A; Spadaccini M; Desai M; Jegadeesan R; Sathyamurthy A; Vennalaganti P; Kohli D; Hassan C; Pellise M; Repici A; Sharma P; Bourke MJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Oct; 18(11):2448-2455.e3. PubMed ID: 31786330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sundaram S; Seth V; Jearth V; Giri S
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2023 May; 115(5):225-233. PubMed ID: 36148677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Lim XC; Nistala KRY; Ng CH; Lin SY; Tan DJH; Ho KY; Chong CS; Muthiah M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2021 Jul; 27(25):3925-3939. PubMed ID: 34321855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Underwater versus conventional EMR for colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Choi AY; Moosvi Z; Shah S; Roccato MK; Wang AY; Hamerski CM; Samarasena JB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Feb; 93(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 33068608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tip-in endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal sessile polyps.
    Sato Y; Ozawa SI; Yasuda H; Kato M; Kiyokawa H; Yamashita M; Matsuo Y; Yamamoto H; Itoh F
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1820-1826. PubMed ID: 32356110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recurrences of advanced sessile and lateral spreading colorectal adenoma after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) thermal ablation versus no adjuvant therapy (RESPECT): a protocol of an international randomized controlled trial.
    Kemper G; Gerges C; Schoon EJ; Schreuder RM; Schrauwen RRW; Epping LSM; Beyna T; Drenth JPH; Gündug U; Siersema PD; van Geenen EJM;
    Trials; 2024 Feb; 25(1):132. PubMed ID: 38368409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10 mm sessile or flat colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang X; Wang Y; Cao X; Zhang C; Miao L
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0299931. PubMed ID: 38451998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Sessile or Flat Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Nagl S; Ebigbo A; Goelder SK; Roemmele C; Neuhaus L; Weber T; Braun G; Probst A; Schnoy E; Kafel AJ; Muzalyova A; Messmann H
    Gastroenterology; 2021 Nov; 161(5):1460-1474.e1. PubMed ID: 34371000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a meta-analysis.
    Li P; Ma B; Gong S; Zhang X; Li W
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):3003-3013. PubMed ID: 32577813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10-mm colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li DF; Lai MG; Yang MF; Zou ZY; Xu J; Peng RM; Xiong F; Wei C; Zhang DG; Xu ZL; Wang LS; Yao J
    Endoscopy; 2021 Jun; 53(6):636-646. PubMed ID: 32767283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cold endoscopic mucosal resection versus cold snare polypectomy for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Arruda do Espirito Santo P; Meine GC; Baraldo S; Barbosa EC
    Endoscopy; 2024 Jul; 56(7):503-511. PubMed ID: 38503302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Underwater colorectal EMR: remodeling endoscopic mucosal resection.
    Curcio G; Granata A; Ligresti D; Tarantino I; Barresi L; Liotta R; Traina M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 May; 81(5):1238-42. PubMed ID: 25746979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness and safety of the different endoscopic resection methods for 10- to 20-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and pooled analysis.
    Yuan X; Gao H; Liu C; Cui H; Zhang Z; Xie J; Lu H; Xu L
    Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2021; 27(6):331-341. PubMed ID: 34643573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.