These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33386139)

  • 1. Fabrication of additively manufactured custom impression copings based on stock abutments.
    Abdel Raheem IM; Darwish RM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Apr; 127(4):560-564. PubMed ID: 33386139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Novel Design of a Pick-up-Type Impression Coping.
    Muchhala M; Unozawa S; Kadempour A; Froum SJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2020 Jun; 41(6):336-339. PubMed ID: 32551716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of Implant-Supported Custom Milled Impression Copings to Capture Soft-Tissue Contours and Incisal Guidance.
    Bukhari SA; Proussaefs P; AlHelal A; Garbacea A; AlBader B; Kattadiyil MT
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):473-479. PubMed ID: 30730087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Axial displacements in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
    Lee JH; Kim DG; Park CJ; Cho LR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e83-9. PubMed ID: 23088616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A digital implant custom tray fabrication method using the design process for simulating the position of the impression copings and 3D printing technology.
    Kim JE; Kwon DH; Kim JH; Shim JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):566-570. PubMed ID: 30563707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the accuracy of impressions made of 2 implants with interfering axial convergence with CAD-CAM impression copings and the altered cast technique: An in vitro study.
    Sadegholvad M; Ansarifard E; Derafshi R; Dehno SMS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):745.e1-745.e7. PubMed ID: 36309469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of replacing three tapered transfer impression copings in two elastomeric impression materials.
    Liou AD; Nicholls JI; Yuodelis RA; Brudvik JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 8240649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital workflow for the design and additively manufacture of a splinted framework and custom tray for the impression of multiple implants: A dental technique.
    Piedra Cascón W; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):805-811. PubMed ID: 30067479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Custom copings for accurate impressions of multiple internal connection implants.
    Ntounis A; Pelekanos S
    Implant Dent; 2010 Oct; 19(5):365-9. PubMed ID: 20881806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Nov; 92(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 15523336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of impression coping splinting on the accuracy of the open-tray technique.
    Kavadia V; Kourtis S; Zoidis P; Sarafianou A
    Gen Dent; 2019; 67(3):e5-e9. PubMed ID: 31199752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques.
    Del Acqua MA; Chavez AM; Castanharo SM; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 21197492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 1--Influence of transfer copings surface abrasion.
    Assunção WG; Cardoso A; Gomes EA; Tabata LF; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):641-7. PubMed ID: 19090889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel technique using a coded healing abutment for the fabrication of a CAD/CAM titanium abutment for an implant-supported restoration.
    Grossmann Y; Pasciuta M; Finger IM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 16543025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of implant impression techniques.
    Assif D; Marshak B; Schmidt A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 8666454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.