These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33386139)

  • 21. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Orthodontic elastomeric chain as an alternative to dental floss for splinting implant impression copings for complete-arch implant impressions.
    Joshi AA; Gaikwad AM; Nadgere JB; Ram SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):188-189. PubMed ID: 31759565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of 2 impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of working implant prosthesis models: an in vitro study.
    Calesini G; Zarone F; Sorrentino R; Micarelli C; Fabianelli A; Papacchini F; Gherlone E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):822-7. PubMed ID: 24820709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Splinting Open Tray Impression Copings Using Long Shank Carbide Burs during Definitive Impression: A Dental Technique.
    Fernandes DS; Anasane NS; Jagtap AK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 May; 23(5):566-568. PubMed ID: 35986468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Utilization of digital technologies for fabrication of definitive implant-supported restorations.
    Ramsey CD; Ritter RG
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Oct; 24(5):299-308. PubMed ID: 23025311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An accurate, single, platform-level impression technique for the fabrication of prosthetic restorations on dental implants.
    Marder MZ; Marder RW
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Oct; 25(5):495-9. PubMed ID: 16250571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impression techniques for implant dentistry.
    Chee W; Jivraj S
    Br Dent J; 2006 Oct; 201(7):429-32. PubMed ID: 17031344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of digital technologies in fabrication of a custom healing stent after stage II implant surgery for advanced jaw reconstruction.
    Kincade C; Karimi-Boushehri F; Osswald M; Nayar S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):545-550. PubMed ID: 32499167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The O-ring universal impression technique.
    Hussaini S
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):599-600. PubMed ID: 18761567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Custom CAD-CAM healing abutment and impression coping milled from a poly(methyl methacrylate) block and bonded to a titanium insert.
    Proussaefs P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Nov; 116(5):657-662. PubMed ID: 27422231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments.
    Eliasson A; Ortorp A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e30-8. PubMed ID: 21453396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of Implant Angulation and Impression Coping Type on the Dimensional Accuracy of Impressions.
    Shim JS; Ryu JJ; Shin SW; Lee JY
    Implant Dent; 2015 Dec; 24(6):726-9. PubMed ID: 26384100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Technique Using a Novel Verification Guide for Complete Seating of Open-Tray Impression Copings.
    Valladares A; Grisa A; Cho SC; Froum SJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2020 Feb; 41(2):112-117. PubMed ID: 32017588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of marginal fit of cemented zirconia copings manufactured after digital impression with lava™ C.O.S and conventional impression technique.
    Dauti R; Cvikl B; Franz A; Schwarze UY; Lilaj B; Rybaczek T; Moritz A
    BMC Oral Health; 2016 Dec; 16(1):129. PubMed ID: 27931256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An in vitro evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal- and external-connection implant prostheses.
    Vigolo P; Mutinelli S; Fonzi F; Stellini E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):807-18. PubMed ID: 25032760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impression technique for a complete-arch prosthesis with multiple implants using additive manufacturing technologies.
    Revilla-León M; Sánchez-Rubio JL; Oteo-Calatayud J; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):714-720. PubMed ID: 27889076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Passive fit and accuracy of three dental implant impression techniques.
    Al Quran FA; Rashdan BA; Zomar AA; Weiner S
    Quintessence Int; 2012 Feb; 43(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 22257873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of multiple use of impression copings on the accuracy of implant transfer.
    Alikhasi M; Bassir SH; Naini RB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):408-14. PubMed ID: 23527342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of splinting in accuracy of two implant impression techniques.
    de Avila ED; de Matos Moraes F; Castanharo SM; Del'Acqua MA; de Assis Mollo F
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 25506658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.