These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33386287)

  • 1. Influence of the file format and transmission app on the radiographic diagnosis of caries lesions.
    Madlum DV; Gaêta-Araujo H; Brasil DM; Lima CAS; Oliveira ML; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Oct; 132(4):448-455. PubMed ID: 33386287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of proximal caries in images resulting from different modes of radiographic digitalization.
    Xavier CR; Araujo-Pires AC; Poleti ML; Rubira-Bullen IR; Ferreira O; Capelozza AL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Sep; 40(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 21831972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of the image file format of digital periapical radiographs on the diagnosis of external and internal root resorptions.
    Miranda-Viana M; Madlum DV; Oliveira-Santos N; Gaêta-Araujo H; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Aug; 25(8):4941-4948. PubMed ID: 33495894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital file format does not influence the radiographic diagnosis of vertical root fracture.
    Miranda-Viana M; Fontenele RC; Farias Gomes A; Nogueira-Reis F; Nejaim Y; Oliveira ML; Freitas DQ
    Oral Radiol; 2022 Oct; 38(4):452-458. PubMed ID: 34626307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of wavelet and discrete cosine transform compression of digital radiographs on the detection of subtle proximal caries. ROC analysis.
    Schulze RK; Richter A; d'Hoedt B
    Caries Res; 2008; 42(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 18701823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of brightness and contrast adjustments on the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions.
    Nascimento EH; Gaêta-Araujo H; Vasconcelos KF; Freire BB; Oliveira-Santos C; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Dec; 47(8):20180100. PubMed ID: 29851369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro comparison of two types of digital X-ray sensors for proximal caries detection validated by micro-computed tomography.
    Heck K; Litzenburger F; Ullmann V; Hoffmann L; Kunzelmann KH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Mar; 50(3):20200338. PubMed ID: 32822231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DICOM file format has better radiographic image quality than other file formats: an objective study.
    Miranda-Viana M; Fontenele RC; Nogueira-Reis F; Farias-Gomes A; Oliveira ML; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F
    Braz Dent J; 2023; 34(4):150-157. PubMed ID: 37909638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is the digital radiographic detection of approximal caries lesions influenced by viewing conditions?
    Lima CAS; Nascimento EHL; Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira-Santos C; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Feb; 129(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 31474575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of different radiographic methods for detecting occlusal caries lesions.
    Tarım Ertas E; Küçükyılmaz E; Ertaş H; Savaş S; Yırcalı Atıcı M
    Caries Res; 2014; 48(6):566-74. PubMed ID: 25073755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the accuracy of caries diagnosis via radiograph. Film versus print.
    Otis LL; Sherman RG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Mar; 136(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 15819345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic exposure compensation and subjective image enhancement in the radiographic diagnosis of caries.
    GalvÃo NS; Nascimento EHL; GaÊta-Araujo H; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
    Braz Oral Res; 2020; 34():e082. PubMed ID: 32785477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the addition of a lead foil to digital radiographic receptors influence image contrast and approximal caries lesions diagnosis?
    Fontenele RC; Nejaim Y; Farias Gomes A; Gaêta-Araujo H; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 May; 49(4):20190384. PubMed ID: 32027521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of data compression on proximal caries detection: observer performance with DenOptix photostimulable phosphor images.
    Pabla T; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Abreu M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jan; 32(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 12820853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10654032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions.
    Cheng JG; Zhang ZL; Wang XY; Zhang ZY; Ma XC; Li G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1015-21. PubMed ID: 21805053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Peker I; Toraman Alkurt M; Altunkaynak B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):495-9. PubMed ID: 18033947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ex vivo evaluation of new 2D and 3D dental radiographic technology for detecting caries.
    Gaalaas L; Tyndall D; Mol A; Everett ET; Bangdiwala A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150281. PubMed ID: 26670605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.