These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33388028)

  • 1. Assessment of the reproducibility and precision of milling and 3D printing surgical guides.
    Mukai S; Mukai E; Santos-Junior JA; Shibli JA; Faveri M; Giro G
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):1. PubMed ID: 33388028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transfer accuracy of 3D printed versus CAD/CAM milled surgical guides for temporary orthodontic implants: A preclinical micro CT study.
    Schwärzler A; Ludwig B; Chitan P; Lettner S; Sagl B; Jonke E
    J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105060. PubMed ID: 38735471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-fabricated bite splints: milling vs 3D printing.
    Marcel R; Reinhard H; Andreas K
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Dec; 24(12):4607-4615. PubMed ID: 32436163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
    Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology.
    Rouzé l'Alzit F; Cade R; Naveau A; Babilotte J; Meglioli M; Catros S
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103909. PubMed ID: 34852291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of 3D printing compared with milling - A multi-center analysis of try-in dentures.
    Herpel C; Tasaka A; Higuchi S; Finke D; Kühle R; Odaka K; Rues S; Lux CJ; Yamashita S; Rammelsberg P; Schwindling FS
    J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103681. PubMed ID: 33905767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of surgical guides manufactured with four different 3D printers. A comparative in vitro study.
    Morón-Conejo B; Berrendero S; Salido MP; Zarauz C; Pradíes G
    J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105226. PubMed ID: 38971459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigations on the accuracy of 3D-printed drill guides for dental implantology.
    Neumeister A; Schulz L; Glodecki C
    Int J Comput Dent; 2017; 20(1):35-51. PubMed ID: 28294204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of a simplified 3D-printed implant surgical guide.
    Kim T; Lee S; Kim GB; Hong D; Kwon J; Park JW; Kim N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):195-201.e2. PubMed ID: 31753464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Manufacturing Technique on the Accuracy of Surgical Guides for Static Computer-Aided Implant Surgery.
    Abduo J; Lau D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(5):931-938. PubMed ID: 32991643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of 3D printed polymers intended for models and surgical guides printed with two different 3D printers.
    Johansson C; Dibes J; Rodriguez LEL; Papia E
    Dent Mater J; 2021 Mar; 40(2):339-347. PubMed ID: 33100299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: An in vitro evaluation of trueness.
    Kalberer N; Mehl A; Schimmel M; Müller F; Srinivasan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):637-643. PubMed ID: 30711292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Intaglio Surface Trueness of Interim Dental Crowns Fabricated with SLA 3D Printing, DLP 3D Printing, and Milling Technologies.
    Son K; Lee JH; Lee KB
    Healthcare (Basel); 2021 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 34442120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trueness and precision of milled and 3D printed root-analogue implants: A comparative in vitro study.
    Aldesoki M; Keilig L; Dörsam I; Evers-Dietze B; Elshazly TM; Bourauel C
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104425. PubMed ID: 36646269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of four CAD-CAM guides for preparing guiding planes of removable partial dentures.
    Bai H; Ye H; Chen H; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Sun Y
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 Jul; 146():105564. PubMed ID: 35569334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of 3D-printing method, resin material, and sterilization on the accuracy of virtually designed surgical implant guides.
    Keßler A; Dosch M; Reymus M; Folwaczny M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 33573833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of DLP and SLA printer technology on the accuracy of surgical guides for implant dentistry in free-end situations.
    Le V; Keßler A; Folwaczny M
    Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Sep; 26(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 36625374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trueness analysis of zirconia crowns fabricated with 3-dimensional printing.
    Wang W; Yu H; Liu Y; Jiang X; Gao B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):285-291. PubMed ID: 30017167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of Dental and Industrial 3D Printers.
    Anadioti E; Kane B; Zhang Y; Bergler M; Mante F; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(S1):30-37. PubMed ID: 35313026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of surgical guides made from conventional and a combination of digital scanning and rapid prototyping techniques.
    Reyes A; Turkyilmaz I; Prihoda TJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 25681352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.