These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3338813)

  • 1. Comparison of time domain algorithms for estimating aortic characteristic impedance in humans.
    Lucas CL; Wilcox BR; Ha B; Henry GW
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1988 Jan; 35(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 3338813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Towards new indices of arterial stiffness using systolic pulse contour analysis: a theoretical point of view.
    Chemla D; Plamann K; Nitenberg A
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 2008 Feb; 51(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 18287877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Importance of the differential pressure between the left ventricle and aorta.
    Smirnov AD; Zeidlits VN; Lovyagin EV
    Hum Physiol; 1981; 7(6):483-7. PubMed ID: 7348239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-invasive model-based estimation of aortic pulse pressure using suprasystolic brachial pressure waveforms.
    Lowe A; Harrison W; El-Aklouk E; Ruygrok P; Al-Jumaily AM
    J Biomech; 2009 Sep; 42(13):2111-5. PubMed ID: 19665136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Aortic pressure and velocity signals processing: application to human aorta characterization (author's transl)].
    Fontenier G; Mérillon JP; Lerallut JF; Jaffrin MY; Motte G
    J Physiol (Paris); 1980; 76(7):741-7. PubMed ID: 7218163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Independent prognostic value of the ambulatory arterial stiffness index and aortic pulse wave velocity in a general population.
    Hansen TW; Li Y; Staessen JA; Jeppesen J; Rasmussen S; Wang JG; Thijs L; Ibsen H; Safar ME; Torp-Pedersen C
    J Hum Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 22(3):214-6. PubMed ID: 17928876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vascular pulsatility in patients with a pulsatile- or continuous-flow ventricular assist device.
    Travis AR; Giridharan GA; Pantalos GM; Dowling RD; Prabhu SD; Slaughter MS; Sobieski M; Undar A; Farrar DJ; Koenig SC
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Feb; 133(2):517-24. PubMed ID: 17258591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of flow rates through aortic branches in the anesthetized rabbit.
    Barakat AI; Marini RP; Colton CK
    Lab Anim Sci; 1997 Apr; 47(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 9150499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pressure-flow loops and instantaneous input impedance in the thoracic aorta: another way to assess the effect of aortic bypass graft implantation on myocardial, brain, and subdiaphragmatic perfusion.
    Mekkaoui C; Rolland PH; Friggi A; Rasigni M; Mesana TG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Mar; 125(3):699-710. PubMed ID: 12658214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between vascular expansion of the aorta and pulmonary artery and the genesis of the impedance cardiogram using the technique of sonomicrometry.
    Hayes JK; Peters JL; Hare BD; Baker LE
    J Med Eng Technol; 2007; 31(6):419-27. PubMed ID: 17994415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exponentially tapered T-tube model in the characterization of arterial non-uniformity.
    Chang KC; Kuo TS
    J Theor Biol; 1996 Nov; 183(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 8959109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comments on "noninvasive estimation of cardiac output".
    Cappello A; Cardaioli A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 May; 40(5):504-6. PubMed ID: 8225341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the pathogenesis of coarctational hypertension.
    Sehested J
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Suppl; 1984; 35():1-48. PubMed ID: 6588543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Normal standards for cardiovascular data. II. Pressure and vascular resistances.
    Krovetz LJ; Goldbloom S
    Johns Hopkins Med J; 1972 Mar; 130(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 5060758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantification of pulsatility as a function of vascular input impedance: an in vitro study.
    Kaebnick BW; Giridharan GA; Koenig SC
    ASAIO J; 2007; 53(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 17413547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blood pressure estimation in the human fetal descending aorta.
    Struijk PC; Mathews VJ; Loupas T; Stewart PA; Clark EB; Steegers EA; Wladimiroff JW
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 32(5):673-81. PubMed ID: 18816497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro characterization of aortic retrograde and antegrade flow from pulsatile and non-pulsatile ventricular assist devices.
    DiGiorgi PL; Smith DL; Naka Y; Oz MC
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2004 Feb; 23(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 14761766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The analysis of radial artery pressure waveforms using 4 element model].
    Hayashi K; Sigemi K
    Masui; 2003 Sep; 52(9):1011-20. PubMed ID: 14531267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determinants of aortic input impedance in two ethnic populations: impact of obesity.
    Reimann M; Schutte AE; Schutte R; Malan L; Huisman HW; van Rooyen JM; Schwarz PE; Malan NT
    J Hum Hypertens; 2007 Sep; 21(9):747-9. PubMed ID: 17508014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noninvasive arterial compliance estimation.
    Švec D; Javorka M
    Physiol Res; 2021 Dec; 70(Suppl4):S483-S494. PubMed ID: 35199538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.