These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3338901)
1. The effects of clinical information on film interpretation. Another perspective. Swensson RG Invest Radiol; 1988 Jan; 23(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 3338901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The ACE test for sarcoidosis: when to use, how to interpret. Mayewski R Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1981 Oct; 16(10):76A-76B, 76D-76H, 76L-76M passim. PubMed ID: 6277760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An analysis of the value of additional diagnostic procedures. Gregg EC; Rao PS; Friedell HL Invest Radiol; 1976; 11(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 955837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical history and accurate interpretation of chest radiographs. Coblentz CL; Norman G AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Jan; 156(1):197-8. PubMed ID: 1898558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Changing radiologists' expectations: false information versus years of experience. Larson DB Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):327; author reply 327-8. PubMed ID: 21931145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Using localization data from image interpretations to improve estimates of performance accuracy. Swensson RG Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(2):170-85. PubMed ID: 10772355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can order of report prevent satisfaction of search in abdominal contrast studies? Berbaum KS; Franken EA; Dorfman DD; Caldwell RT; Lu CH Acad Radiol; 2005 Jan; 12(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 15691728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computerized analysis of abnormal asymmetry in digital chest radiographs: evaluation of potential utility. Armato SG; Giger ML; MacMahon H J Digit Imaging; 1999 Feb; 12(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 10036666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Irreversible data compression in chest imaging using computed radiography: an evaluation. Mori T; Nakata H J Thorac Imaging; 1994; 9(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 8114161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Observer performance in detecting multiple radiographic signals. Prediction and analysis using a generalized ROC approach. Metz CE; Starr SJ; Lusted LB Radiology; 1976 Nov; 121(2):337-47. PubMed ID: 981610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Thoracic pseudo-lesions induced by incorrect techniques, optical illusions, and anatomic variations]. Brauner M; Rety F J Radiol; 2001 Sep; 82(9 Pt 2):1065-6. PubMed ID: 11686151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Frequent errors in the interpretation of chest x-ray films]. Vock P Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Jun; 117(24):928-32. PubMed ID: 3616585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. One-shot dual-energy subtraction chest imaging with computed radiography: clinical evaluation of film images. Ishigaki T; Sakuma S; Ikeda M Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 3289096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A constrained formulation for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve based on probability summation. Swensson RG; King JL; Gur D Med Phys; 2001 Aug; 28(8):1597-609. PubMed ID: 11548929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of kilovoltage on diagnostic accuracy in chest radiography. Revesz G; Shea FJ; Kundel HL Radiology; 1982 Mar; 142(3):615-8. PubMed ID: 7063674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]