126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33389050)
21. Monte Carlo calculation of the dose distributions of two 106Ru eye applicators.
Sánchez-Reyes A; Tello JI; Guix B; Salvat F
Radiother Oncol; 1998 Nov; 49(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 10052886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Measured and Monte Carlo simulated surface dose reduction for superficial X-rays incident on tissue with underlying air or bone.
Baines J; Zawlodzka S; Markwell T; Chan M
Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):926-933. PubMed ID: 29235131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dosimetric effect of nanoparticles in the breast cancer treatment using INTRABEAM
Tegaw EM; Geraily G; Etesami SM; Ghanbari H; Gholami S; Shojaei M; Farzin M; Tadesse GF
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Apr; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 33836513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Rotational radiotherapy of breast cancer with polyenergetic kilovoltage X-ray beams: An experimental and Monte Carlo phantom study.
Buonanno F; Sarno A; De Lucia PA; Di Lillo F; Masi M; Di Franco F; Mettivier G; Russo P
Phys Med; 2019 Jun; 62():63-72. PubMed ID: 31153400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Monte Carlo commissioning of clinical electron beams using large field measurements.
O'Shea TP; Sawkey DL; Foley MJ; Faddegon BA
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(14):4083-105. PubMed ID: 20601775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Intraoperative Radiotherapy With INTRABEAM: Technical and Dosimetric Considerations.
Sethi A; Emami B; Small W; Thomas TO
Front Oncol; 2018; 8():74. PubMed ID: 29632850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dosimetry of MammoSite® applicator: comparison between Monte Carlo simulation, measurements, and treatment planning calculation.
Oshaghi M; Sadeghi M; Mahdavi SR; Shirazi A
J Cancer Res Ther; 2013; 9(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 23771363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of TG-43 and TG-186 in breast irradiation using a low energy electronic brachytherapy source.
White SA; Landry G; Fonseca GP; Holt R; Rusch T; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F; Reniers B
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061701. PubMed ID: 24877796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Therapeutic analysis of Intrabeam-based intraoperative radiation therapy in the treatment of unicentric breast cancer lesions utilizing a spherical target volume model.
Schwid M; Donnelly ED; Zhang H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):184-194. PubMed ID: 28741896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A novel approach for superficial intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) using a 50 kV X-ray source: a technical and case report.
Schneider F; Clausen S; Thölking J; Wenz F; Abo-Madyan Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 15(1):4502. PubMed ID: 24423847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Monte Carlo simulation of electron beams generated by a 12 MeV dedicated mobile IORT accelerator.
Iaccarino G; Strigari L; D'Andrea M; Bellesi L; Felici G; Ciccotelli A; Benassi M; Soriani A
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4579-96. PubMed ID: 21725139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Monte Carlo Simulation of Electron Beams produced by LIAC Intraoperative Radiation Therapy Accelerator.
Robatjazi M; Tanha K; Mahdavi SR; Baghani HR; Mirzaei HR; Mousavi M; Nafissi N; Akbari E
J Biomed Phys Eng; 2018 Mar; 8(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 29732339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Organ absorbed doses in the IORT treatment of breast cancer with the INTRABEAM device: a Monte-Carlo study.
Nasir Z; Probst L; Schneider F; Clausen S; Bürgy D; Glatting G; Nwankwo O
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Feb; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 36745910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Commissioning and quality assurance for the treatment delivery components of the AccuBoost system.
Iftimia I; Talmadge M; Ladd R; Halvorsen P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):5156. PubMed ID: 26103184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The novel technique of delivering targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (Targit) for early breast cancer.
Vaidya JS; Baum M; Tobias JS; Morgan S; D'Souza D
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2002 Jun; 28(4):447-54. PubMed ID: 12099658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dosimetric optimization of a conical breast brachytherapy applicator for improved skin dose sparing.
Yang Y; Rivard MJ
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5665-71. PubMed ID: 21158278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Attenuation of intracavitary applicators in 192Ir-HDR brachytherapy.
Ye SJ; Brezovich IA; Shen S; Duan J; Popple RA; Pareek PN
Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2097-106. PubMed ID: 15305463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dosimetric characteristics of the INTRABEAM ® system with spherical applicators in the presence of air gaps and tissue heterogeneities.
Tegaw EM; Gholami S; Omyan G; Geraily G
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2020 May; 59(2):295-306. PubMed ID: 32236740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An approach to using conventional brachytherapy software for clinical treatment planning of complex, Monte Carlo-based brachytherapy dose distributions.
Rivard MJ; Melhus CS; Granero D; Perez-Calatayud J; Ballester F
Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1968-75. PubMed ID: 19610285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Monte Carlo simulation and analytical calculation methods to investigate the potential of nanoparticles for INTRABEAM® IORT machine.
Omyan G; Gholami S; Zad AG; Severgnini M; Longo F; Kalantari F
Nanomedicine; 2020 Nov; 30():102288. PubMed ID: 32805406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
