These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33389917)

  • 21. Effect of abutment modification and cement type on retention of cement-retained implant supported crowns.
    Farzin M; Torabi K; Ahangari AH; Derafshi R
    J Dent (Tehran); 2014 May; 11(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 25628660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An
    Sarfaraz H; Hassan A; Shenoy KK; Shetty M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(2):166-172. PubMed ID: 31040551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of screw access channel filling materials on uniaxial retentive force of cement-retained implant restorations.
    Cakan U; Gultekin P; Guncu MB; Canay S
    Aust Dent J; 2014 Mar; 59(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 24494783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation and comparison of the film thicknesses of six temporary cements before and after thermal cycling.
    Gumus HO; Kurtulus IL; Kuru E
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Dec; 21(12):1656-1661. PubMed ID: 30560832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of different cementation techniques on retained excess cement and uniaxial retention of the implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Begum Z; Sonika R; Pratik C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1333-7. PubMed ID: 25153002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of porcelain firing and cementation on the marginal fit of implant-supported metal-ceramic restorations fabricated by additive or subtractive manufacturing methods.
    Yildirim B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):476.e1-476.e6. PubMed ID: 32451142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In vitro evaluation of material dependent force damping behavior of implant-supported restorations using different CAD-CAM materials and luting conditions.
    Taha D; Sabet A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):93.e1-93.e9. PubMed ID: 33933269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
    Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of cement film thickness on the retention of implant-retained crowns.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Steiner M; Vollrath O; Kern M
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Dec; 22(8):618-25. PubMed ID: 23915027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
    Güncü MB; Cakan U; Canay S
    Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In Vitro Analysis of Microbiologic Sealing of Two Different Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis Designs Cemented By Four Different Dental Cements.
    Saleh M; Taşar-Faruk S; Güvenir M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(5):910-916. PubMed ID: 34698716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of CAD/CAM Abutment Height and Cement Type on the Retention of Zirconia Crowns.
    Silva CEP; Soares S; Machado CM; Bergamo ETP; Coelho PG; Witek L; Ramalho IS; Jalkh EBB; Bonfante EA
    Implant Dent; 2018 Oct; 27(5):582-587. PubMed ID: 30134265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
    Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of Metal Extension of Crown in the Screw Access Channel of a Posterior Implant Abutment on the Retention of Cement Retained Prosthesis.
    Biyani R; Ali M; Belles D; Powers JM
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Oct; 41(5):537-41. PubMed ID: 23981084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of cement application techniques on the adaptation and retention of provisional crowns.
    Alabdulkader MA; Habib SR
    Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(6):945-955. PubMed ID: 30124460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In-vitro performance of CAD/CAM-fabricated implant-supported temporary crowns.
    Rosentritt M; Raab P; Hahnel S; Stöckle M; Preis V
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2581-2587. PubMed ID: 28110407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Retrievability of implant-supported zirconia restorations cemented on zirconia abutments.
    Lennartz A; Dohmen A; Bishti S; Fischer H; Wolfart S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):740-746. PubMed ID: 29807736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.