These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33389917)

  • 41. The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An
    Bajoghli F; Fathi A; Ebadian B; Jowkar M; Sabouhi M
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():22. PubMed ID: 36960017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Occlusal Thickness and Cement-Type Effects on Fracture Resistance of Implant-Supported Posterior Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.
    Bulut AC; Atsü SS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(3):485-491. PubMed ID: 34115062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Influence of screw access on the retention of cement-retained implant prostheses.
    da Rocha PV; Freitas MA; de Morais Alves da Cunha T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 23566608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The Effect of Temporary Cement Cleaning Methods on the Retention of Crowns.
    Song MY; An H; Park EJ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e210-e215. PubMed ID: 28598530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of Preseating, Screw Access Opening, and Vent Holes on Extrusion of Excess Cement at the Crown-Abutment Margin and Associated Tensile Force for Cement-Retained Implant Restorations.
    Jimenez RA; Vargas-Koudriavtsev T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 27447146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The influence of different convergence angles and resin cements on the retention of zirconia copings.
    Ali AO; Kelly JR; Zandparsa R
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):614-21. PubMed ID: 22823334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparative in vitro study of cementing techniques for implant-supported restorations.
    Liang T; Hu X; Zhu L; Pan X; Zhou Y; Liu J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jul; 116(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 26946915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
    Lewinstein I; Block L; Lehr Z; Ormianer Z; Matalon S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Influence of space size of abutment screw access channel on the amount of extruded excess cement and marginal accuracy of cement-retained single implant restorations.
    Al Amri MD; Al-Johany SS; Al-Qarni MN; Al-Bakri AS; Al-Maflehi NS; Abualsaud HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):263-269. PubMed ID: 28552289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Should the vent hole of posterior implant crowns be placed on the lateral surface? An in vitro study of the hydrodynamic feature of cement extrusion and retention ability.
    Ye S; Zhou H; Lyu X; Feng H; Liu M; Wen C
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0276198. PubMed ID: 36264869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of implant abutment angulations on the fracture resistance of overlaying CAM-milled zirconia single crowns.
    Ellakwa A; Raj T; Deeb S; Ronaghi G; Martin FE; Klineberg I
    Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 21623803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations.
    Wadhwani C; Chung KH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of implant abutment modification on the extrusion of excess cement at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant restorations.
    Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Hess T; Zhang H; Chung KH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 22167429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Is There a Correlation Between Tensile Strength and Retrievability of Cemented Implant-Retained Crowns Using Artificial Aging?
    Mehl C; Ali S; El Bahra S; Harder S; Vollrath O; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 26757337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing.
    Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
    J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):866-72. PubMed ID: 22819954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effects of crown venting or pre-cementing of CAD/CAM-constructed all-ceramic crowns luted on YTZ implants on marginal cement excess.
    Zaugg LK; Zehnder I; Rohr N; Fischer J; Zitzmann NU
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 29044723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Microleakage of Glass Ionomer-based Provisional Cement in CAD/CAM-Fabricated Interim Crowns: An in vitro Study.
    Farah RI; Al-Harethi N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Oct; 17(10):801-806. PubMed ID: 27794149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The Effect of Milling Metal Versus Milling Wax on Implant Framework Retention and Adaptation.
    Ghodsi S; Pirmoazen S; Beyabanaki E; Rostami M; Alikhasi M
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e739-e743. PubMed ID: 29855135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The effect of recementation on crown retention.
    Ayad MF; Rosenstiel SF; Woelfel JB
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 9709609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.