These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33390168)

  • 1. Public attitudes and health law in conflict: somatic vs. mental care, role of next of kin, and the right to refuse treatment and information.
    Wikstøl D; Pedersen R; Magelssen M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jan; 21(1):3. PubMed ID: 33390168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experiences of involuntary psychiatric admission decision-making: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of the perspectives of service users, informal carers, and professionals.
    Sugiura K; Pertega E; Holmberg C
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 73():101645. PubMed ID: 33246221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Next of kin's experiences of involvement during involuntary hospitalisation and coercion.
    Førde R; Norvoll R; Hem MH; Pedersen R
    BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):76. PubMed ID: 27881139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coercive interventions under the new Dutch mental health law: Towards a CRPD-compliant law?
    Alexandrov NV; Schuck N
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 76():101685. PubMed ID: 33735651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Citizen attitudes to non-treatment decision making: a Norwegian survey.
    Wikstøl D; Horn MA; Pedersen R; Magelssen M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2023 Mar; 24(1):20. PubMed ID: 36890542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does coercion matter? Supporting young next-of-kin in mental health care.
    Martinsen EH; Weimand B; Norvoll R
    Nurs Ethics; 2020 Aug; 27(5):1270-1281. PubMed ID: 31500502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The influence of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on the German jurisdiction and legalisation regarding compulsory measures].
    Müller S
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2018 Aug; 86(8):485-492. PubMed ID: 30125919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Between authoritarian and dialogical approaches: Attitudes and opinions on coercion among professionals in mental health and addiction care in Norway.
    Aasland OG; Husum TL; Førde R; Pedersen R
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 57():106-112. PubMed ID: 29548497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The silent world of young next of kin in mental healthcare.
    Martinsen EH; Weimand BM; Pedersen R; Norvoll R
    Nurs Ethics; 2019 Feb; 26(1):212-223. PubMed ID: 29281928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rising to the human rights challenge in compulsory treatment--new approaches to mental health law in Australia.
    Callaghan S; Ryan CJ
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2012 Jul; 46(7):611-20. PubMed ID: 22355197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unlocking the impact of the CRPD on Swedish mental health law.
    Nilsson A
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2024; 93():101966. PubMed ID: 38430626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An end to coercion: rights and decision-making in mental health care.
    Sugiura K; Mahomed F; Saxena S; Patel V
    Bull World Health Organ; 2020 Jan; 98(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 31902962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The CRPD and mental health law reform in Scotland.
    Stavert J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2024; 94():101991. PubMed ID: 38663171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: a new approach to decision-making in mental health law.
    Morrissey F
    Eur J Health Law; 2012 Dec; 19(5):423-40. PubMed ID: 23198484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interpretations of legal criteria for involuntary psychiatric admission: a qualitative analysis.
    Feiring E; Ugstad KN
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 Oct; 14():500. PubMed ID: 25344295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Impacting Mental Health Laws and Policies in High-Income Countries? A Case Study of Implementation in Canada.
    Hoffman SJ; Sritharan L; Tejpar A
    BMC Int Health Hum Rights; 2016 Nov; 16(1):28. PubMed ID: 27836014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-level protection of rights: India's Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 and the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Articles 12 and 14).
    Kelly BD
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2023; 91():101937. PubMed ID: 37738687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protecting mental health clients' dignity - the importance of legal control.
    Kogstad RE
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(6):383-91. PubMed ID: 19796819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attitudinal variance among patients, next of kin and health care professionals towards the use of containment measures in three psychiatric hospitals in Switzerland.
    Hotzy F; Jaeger M; Buehler E; Moetteli S; Klein G; Beeri S; Reisch T
    BMC Psychiatry; 2019 Apr; 19(1):128. PubMed ID: 31035954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Criteria for involuntary psychiatric admission – changes from 1848 until today].
    Øvregard MDS; Lie AK
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2020 Mar; 140(5):. PubMed ID: 32238957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.