These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33390168)

  • 21. The reform of Irish mental health law: Aligning with human rights obligations?
    O'Mahony C
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2024; 95():102004. PubMed ID: 38943689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Experience of coercion among nursing professionals in a medium-stay mental health unit: A qualitative study in Spain.
    Aragonés-Calleja M; Sánchez-Martínez V
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2023 Oct; 30(5):983-993. PubMed ID: 36971519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Key, Not a Straitjacket: The Case for Interim Mental Health Legislation Pending Complete Prohibition of Psychiatric Coercion in Accordance with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
    Davidson L
    Health Hum Rights; 2020 Jun; 22(1):163-178. PubMed ID: 32669798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The combined supported decision making model : A template for an ethically justifiable implementation of Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in psychiatry].
    Scholten M; Gather J; Vollmann J
    Nervenarzt; 2022 Nov; 93(11):1093-1103. PubMed ID: 36121451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. "Capacity", "best interests", "will and preferences" and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
    Szmukler G
    World Psychiatry; 2019 Feb; 18(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 30600630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Next of kin's experiences with and attitudes towards digital monitoring technology for ageing people with dementia in residential care facilities. A qualitative study based on the voices of next of kin and care providers.
    Gullslett MK; Nilsen ER; Dugstad J
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2022 Dec; 36(4):1094-1103. PubMed ID: 34121217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Public attitudes towards involuntary admission and treatment by mental health services in Norway.
    Joa I; Hustoft K; Anda LG; Brønnick K; Nielssen O; Johannessen JO; Langeveld JH
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2017; 55():1-7. PubMed ID: 29157507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mental health law and the UN Convention on the rights of Persons with Disabilities.
    Szmukler G; Daw R; Callard F
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 24280316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Staff's normative attitudes towards coercion: the role of moral doubt and professional context-a cross-sectional survey study.
    Molewijk B; Kok A; Husum T; Pedersen R; Aasland O
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 28545519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Relationships, autonomy and legal capacity: Mental capacity and support paradigms.
    Series L
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 40():80-91. PubMed ID: 25982964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Law, ethics and clinical judgment in end-of-life decisions--how do Norwegian doctors think?
    Bahus MK; Steen PA; Førde R
    Resuscitation; 2012 Nov; 83(11):1369-73. PubMed ID: 22542767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Coercion in psychiatry.
    Kallert TW
    Curr Opin Psychiatry; 2008 Sep; 21(5):485-9. PubMed ID: 18650692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Coercion in mental healthcare: the principle of least coercive care.
    O'Brien AJ; Golding CG
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2003 Apr; 10(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 12662333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Increased autonomy with capacity-based mental health legislation in Norway: a qualitative study of patient experiences of having come off a community treatment order.
    Wergeland NC; Fause Å; Weber AK; Fause ABO; Riley H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Apr; 22(1):454. PubMed ID: 35392904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Persuasion or coercion? An empirical ethics analysis about the use of influence strategies in mental health community care.
    Valenti E; Giacco D
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Oct; 22(1):1273. PubMed ID: 36271380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Psychologists and coercion: decisions regarding involuntary psychiatric admission and treatment in a group of Norwegian psychologists.
    Wynn R; Myklebust LH; Bratlid T
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2007; 61(6):433-7. PubMed ID: 18236309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Use of coercion in nursing homes after new legislation].
    Pedersen R; Hem MH; Gjerberg E; Førde R
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2013 Oct; 133(18):1935-9. PubMed ID: 24084969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do Community Treatment Orders in Psychiatry Stand Up to Principalism: Considerations Reflected through the Prism of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
    Newton-Howes G
    J Law Med Ethics; 2019 Mar; 47(1):126-133. PubMed ID: 30994070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Beyond the Pragmatic Definition? The Right to Non-discrimination of Persons with Disabilities in the Context of Coercive Interventions.
    Gurbai S
    Health Hum Rights; 2020 Jun; 22(1):279-292. PubMed ID: 32669807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rights, laws and tensions: A comparative analysis of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the WHO Resource Book on Mental Health, Human Rights and Legislation.
    Duffy RM; Kelly BD
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2017; 54():26-35. PubMed ID: 28962684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.