167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33392037)
1. Optimization of imaging parameters in chest CT for COVID-19 patients: an experimental phantom study.
Niu Y; Huang S; Zhang H; Li S; Li X; Lv Z; Yan S; Fan W; Zhai Y; Wong E; Wang K; Zhang Z; Chen B; Xie R; Xian J
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2021 Jan; 11(1):380-391. PubMed ID: 33392037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical model based iterative reconstruction in clinical CT systems. Part III. Task-based kV/mAs optimization for radiation dose reduction.
Li K; Gomez-Cardona D; Hsieh J; Lubner MG; Pickhardt PJ; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5209-21. PubMed ID: 26328971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Experimental comparison of temporal bone imaging protocol optimization between 10 μm otology CT and multi-slice CT].
Yin GX; Lu WK; Li WH; Xu N; Zhao L; Sun J; Zhao PF; Zhang L; Wang ZC
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Dec; 101(47):3890-3896. PubMed ID: 34905890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Spectral Beam Shaping in Unenhanced Chest CT Examinations: A Phantom Study on Dose Reduction and Image Quality.
Suntharalingam S; Allmendinger T; Blex S; Al-Bayati M; Nassenstein K; Schweiger B; Forsting M; Wetter A
Acad Radiol; 2018 Feb; 25(2):153-158. PubMed ID: 29055683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient size and x-ray technique factors in head computed tomography examinations. II. Image quality.
Huda W; Lieberman KA; Chang J; Roskopf ML
Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):595-601. PubMed ID: 15070259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.
So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of reconstruction methods and x-ray tube current-time product on nodule detection in an anthropomorphic thorax phantom: A crossed-modality JAFROC observer study.
Thompson JD; Chakraborty DP; Szczepura K; Tootell AK; Vamvakas I; Manning DJ; Hogg P
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1265-74. PubMed ID: 26936711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low-dose chest CT and the impact on nodule visibility.
Tugwell-Allsup J; Owen BW; England A
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Feb; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 32499090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Radiation Dose and Image Quality using High-Pitch 70-kV Chest CT in Immunosuppressed Patients.
Yel I; Martin SS; Wichmann JL; Lenga L; Albrecht MH; Bucher AM; Kaltenbach B; Polkowski C; Booz C; Vogl TJ; Hammerstingl RM
Rofo; 2019 Feb; 191(2):122-129. PubMed ID: 30180261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective evaluation of the contrast, radiation dose and image quality of contrast-enhanced CT scans of paediatric abdomens using a low-concentration iodinated contrast agent and low tube voltage combined with 70% ASIR algorithm.
Wang X; Zhong Y; Hu L; Xue L; Shi M; Qiu H; Li J
Int J Clin Pract; 2016 Sep; 70 Suppl 9B():B16-21. PubMed ID: 27577509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of Pulmonary Nodule Volumetry at Different Exposure Parameters in Low-Dose Computed Tomography: A Phantom Study.
Liu J; Qing H; Luo H; He C; Wang C; Ren J; Zhou P
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2019; 43(6):926-930. PubMed ID: 31453975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultralow-dose chest computed tomography for pulmonary nodule detection: first performance evaluation of single energy scanning with spectral shaping.
Gordic S; Morsbach F; Schmidt B; Allmendinger T; Flohr T; Husarik D; Baumueller S; Raupach R; Stolzmann P; Leschka S; Frauenfelder T; Alkadhi H
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):465-73. PubMed ID: 24598443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of low tube voltage on image quality, radiation dose, and low-contrast detectability at abdominal multidetector CT: phantom study.
Tang K; Wang L; Li R; Lin J; Zheng X; Cao G
J Biomed Biotechnol; 2012; 2012():130169. PubMed ID: 22619490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Observer Performance for Detection of Pulmonary Nodules at Chest CT over a Large Range of Radiation Dose Levels.
Fletcher JG; Levin DL; Sykes AG; Lindell RM; White DB; Kuzo RS; Suresh V; Yu L; Leng S; Holmes DR; Inoue A; Johnson MP; Carter RE; McCollough CH
Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):699-707. PubMed ID: 32990514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical value of a new generation adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V) in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodule in low-dose chest CT.
Tang H; Liu Z; Hu Z; He T; Li D; Yu N; Jia Y; Shi H
Br J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 92(1103):20180909. PubMed ID: 31469289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hypervascular liver tumors: low tube voltage, high tube current multi-detector row CT for enhanced detection--phantom study.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Mukundan S; Paulson EK; Jaffe TA; Miller CM; DeLong DM; Kawaji K; Yoshizumi TT; Samei E
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 18096533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of nodules showing ground-glass opacity in the lungs at low-dose multidetector computed tomography: phantom and clinical study.
Funama Y; Awai K; Liu D; Oda S; Yanaga Y; Nakaura T; Kawanaka K; Shimamura M; Yamashita Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 19188784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing image quality and minimizing radiation dose in pediatric abdominal multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography: a study on CARE kV and CARE Dose 4D.
Tian X; Chang Z; Dilixiati S; Haimiti Y; Wang S; Sun J
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2024 Feb; 14(2):1985-1993. PubMed ID: 38415123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols.
Marwan M; Mettin C; Pflederer T; Seltmann M; Schuhbäck A; Muschiol G; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23333186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of image quality and radiation dose using different cone-beam CT exposure parameters.
Yel I; Booz C; Albrecht MH; Gruber-Rouh T; Polkowski C; Jacobi M; Lenga L; Schulz M; Frank J; Marzi I; Vogl TJ; Eichler K; Kaltenbach B
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():68-75. PubMed ID: 31153576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
