These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33393516)

  • 1. Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research.
    Zhu A; Choi ATH; Ma KH; Cao S; Yao H; Wu J; He J
    J Vis Exp; 2020 Dec; (166):. PubMed ID: 33393516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of different informative vibrotactile forward collision warnings: does the warning need to be linked to the collision event?
    Gray R; Ho C; Spence C
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87070. PubMed ID: 24475225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic vibrotactile signals for forward collision avoidance warning systems.
    Meng F; Gray R; Ho C; Ahtamad M; Spence C
    Hum Factors; 2015 Mar; 57(2):329-46. PubMed ID: 25850161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 16697344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic vibrotactile warning signals for frontal collision avoidance: towards the torso versus towards the head.
    Meng F; Ho C; Gray R; Spence C
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(3):411-25. PubMed ID: 25374255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Driver reaction time to tactile and auditory rear-end collision warnings while talking on a cell phone.
    Mohebbi R; Gray R; Tan HZ
    Hum Factors; 2009 Feb; 51(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 19634313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study on driver's active emergency response in dangerous traffic scenes based on driving simulator.
    Ma S; Xu S; Song J; Wang K; Qin H; Wang R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(2):116-121. PubMed ID: 38019530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing spatially static and dynamic vibrotactile take-over requests in the driver seat.
    Petermeijer SM; Cieler S; de Winter JCF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):218-227. PubMed ID: 27978486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hazard warning modalities and timing thresholds for older drivers with impaired vision.
    Xu J; R Bowers A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jul; 202():107599. PubMed ID: 38669900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A user study of directional tactile and auditory user interfaces for take-over requests in conditionally automated vehicles.
    Gruden T; Tomažič S; Sodnik J; Jakus G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106766. PubMed ID: 35785713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gaze position modulates the effectiveness of forward collision warnings for drowsy drivers.
    Gaspar JG; Schwarz CW; Brown TL; Kang J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():25-30. PubMed ID: 29277383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Population distributions of time to collision at brake application during car following from naturalistic driving data.
    Kusano KD; Chen R; Montgomery J; Gabler HC
    J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():95-104. PubMed ID: 26403908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulator study of young driver's instinctive response of lower extremity to a collision.
    Gao Z; Li C; Hu H; Zhao H; Chen C; Yu H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 May; 17(4):423-9. PubMed ID: 26375629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tactile warning signals for in-vehicle systems.
    Meng F; Spence C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Feb; 75():333-46. PubMed ID: 25569607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Which accuracy levels of positioning technologies do drivers really need in connected vehicle settings for safety?
    Wu C; Zhang W; You X; Du N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106106. PubMed ID: 34016444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.