235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33393741)
1. Effect of Chairside CAD/CAM Restoration Type on Marginal Fit Accuracy: A Comparison of Crown, Inlay and Onlay Restorations.
Merrill TC; Mackey T; Luc R; Lung D; Naseem A; Abduo J
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 May; 29(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 33393741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Micro-CT Evaluation of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Crown and Inlay Restorations Fabricated Via Different Digital Scanners belonging to the Same CAD-CAM System.
Ekici Z; Kılıçarslan MA; Bilecenoğlu B; Ocak M
Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(3):381–389. PubMed ID: 33751000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue.
Guess PC; Vagkopoulou T; Zhang Y; Wolkewitz M; Strub JR
J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 24161516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials.
Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of Different CAM Strategies on the Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Digital Three-dimensional Evaluation.
Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(5):530-538. PubMed ID: 29630483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM inlay/onlay restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies.
Goujat A; Abouelleil H; Colon P; Jeannin C; Pradelle N; Seux D; Grosgogeat B
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):590-597.e3. PubMed ID: 30509548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns.
Dolev E; Bitterman Y; Meirowitz A
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):124-128. PubMed ID: 29961628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of scanner, powder application, and adjustments on CAD-CAM crown misfit.
Prudente MS; Davi LR; Nabbout KO; Prado CJ; Pereira LM; Zancopé K; Neves FD
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 28689912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach.
Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras.
de Paula Silveira AC; Chaves SB; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 27677214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of the Crystallization Firing Process on Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Silicate-based Glass-ceramic Inlays Fabricated With a CAD/CAM Chairside System.
Kobayashi M; Niizuma Y; Sugai R; Manabe A
Oper Dent; 2023 Nov; 48(6):657-665. PubMed ID: 37882476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of inlay and onlay restorations based on 3D printing or milling technique - a pilot study.
Ahlholm P; Sipilä K; Vallittu P; Kotiranta U; Lappalainen R
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 May; 27(2):56-64. PubMed ID: 31046209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment.
Sturdevant JR; Bayne SC; Heymann HO
J Esthet Dent; 1999; 11(4):206-14. PubMed ID: 10825877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays.
Denissen H; Dozić A; van der Zel J; van Waas M
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):506-13. PubMed ID: 11105006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM onlays: Influence of preparation design and impression technique.
Lima FF; Neto CF; Rubo JH; Santos GC; Moraes Coelho Santos MJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 29551386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single crowns manufactured with an analog workflow and three CAD-CAM systems: A prospective clinical study.
Sanchez-Lara A; Hosney S; Lampraki E; Conejo J; Blatz MB; Barmak AB; Ercoli C; Chochlidakis K
J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):689-696. PubMed ID: 36883776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal and internal fit of full ceramic crowns milled using CADCAM systems on cadaver full arch scans.
Vág J; Nagy Z; Bocklet C; Kiss T; Nagy Á; Simon B; Mikolicz Á; Renne W
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jul; 20(1):189. PubMed ID: 32631333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique.
Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does cad software affect the marginal and internal fit of milled full ceramic crowns?
Akat B; Şentürk A; Ocak M; Kiliçarslan MA; Özcan M
Braz Oral Res; 2022; 36():e042. PubMed ID: 35293507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
