These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33393741)

  • 21. Effect of tooth preparation design on marginal adaptation of composite resin CAD-CAM onlays.
    Yang Y; Yang Z; Zhou J; Chen L; Tan J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 31672425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Marginal and internal adaptation of ceramic crown restorations fabricated with CAD/CAM technology and the heat-press technique.
    Mously HA; Finkelman M; Zandparsa R; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 24795263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of loupes versus microscope-enhanced CAD-CAM crown preparations: A microcomputed tomography analysis of marginal gaps.
    Atlas AM; Janyavula S; Elsabee R; Alper E; Isleem WF; Bergler M; Setzer FC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):643-651. PubMed ID: 35643825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM Crowns Fabricated Using Two Different Chairside CAD/CAM Systems on Preparations of Varying Quality.
    Renne W; Wolf B; Kessler R; McPherson K; Mennito AS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2015; 27(4):194-202. PubMed ID: 26177118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of Crystallization Firing on Marginal Gap of CAD/CAM Fabricated Lithium Disilicate Crowns.
    Gold SA; Ferracane JL; da Costa J
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jan; 27(1):63-66. PubMed ID: 28514042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):530-536. PubMed ID: 30318049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An overview of the CEREC 3D CAD/CAM system.
    Allen KL; Schenkel AB; Estafan D
    Gen Dent; 2004; 52(3):234-5. PubMed ID: 15206254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of the Fabrication Technique on the Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Ceramic Onlays.
    Neto CF; Santos GC; Santos M
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):163-172. PubMed ID: 31373887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of CEREC II and CEREC III inlays.
    Estafan D; Dussetschleger F; Agosta C; Reich S
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 15055635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series.
    Otto T; Schneider D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Marginal fit of heat-pressed vs. CAD/CAM processed all-ceramic onlays using a milling unit prototype.
    Reich S; Gozdowski S; Trentzsch L; Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(6):644-50. PubMed ID: 19051857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An in vitro study measuring marginal gaps of inlay restorations fabricated from different CAD-CAM materials after thermocycling.
    Taha AI; Hafez ME
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Dec; 23(1):974. PubMed ID: 38057781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Marginal Fit Comparison of CAD/CAM Crowns Milled from Two Different Materials.
    Azarbal A; Azarbal M; Engelmeier RL; Kunkel TC
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):421-428. PubMed ID: 29143397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A new approach to restorative dentistry: fabricating ceramic restorations using CEREC CAD/CAM.
    Estafan D; David A; David S; Calamia J
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Jun; 20(6):555-60; quiz 562. PubMed ID: 10650368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. CAD/CAM system influence marginal fit of different ceramic types?
    de Almeida IG; Antunes DB; Braun NX; Restani A; Straioto FG; Galhano GA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(1):127-129. PubMed ID: 30900671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of different preparation finishing procedures on the marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-produced restorations: A microcomputed tomography evaluation.
    Tamam E; Bankoğlu Güngör M; Karakoca Nemli S; Bilecenoğlu B; Ocak M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Oct; 130(4):605-610. PubMed ID: 34974905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.