These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33395779)

  • 1. The effect of ultrasound cavitation in combination with cryolipolysis as a non-invasive selective procedure for abdominal fat reduction.
    Khedmatgozar H; Yadegari M; Khodadadegan MA; Khodabandeh AK; Ghazavi H; Esmaily H; Sajedeh Yousefian ; Badpeyma M; Mahsa Amarlou ; Bagherniya M; Saghafi N; Sadeghi R; Ferns GA; Ghazizadeh H; Ghayour-Mobarhan M
    Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2020; 14(6):2185-2189. PubMed ID: 33395779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasound cavitation versus cryolipolysis for non-invasive body contouring.
    Mahmoud ELdesoky MT; Mohamed Abutaleb EE; Mohamed Mousa GS
    Australas J Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 57(4):288-293. PubMed ID: 26299702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of focused ultrasound cavitation augmented with aerobic exercise on abdominal and intrahepatic fat in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A randomized controlled trial.
    Taha MM; Aneis YM; Mohamady HM; S A A; Elsayed SH
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250337. PubMed ID: 33909662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noninvasive selective cryolipolysis and reperfusion recovery for localized natural fat reduction and contouring.
    Sasaki GH; Abelev N; Tevez-Ortiz A
    Aesthet Surg J; 2014 Mar; 34(3):420-31. PubMed ID: 24598865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cryolipolysis versus laser lipolysis on adolescent abdominal adiposity.
    Mostafa MS; Elshafey MA
    Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Apr; 48(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 26791606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Paradoxical adipose hyperplasia after cryolipolysis.
    Jalian HR; Avram MM; Garibyan L; Mihm MC; Anderson RR
    JAMA Dermatol; 2014 Mar; 150(3):317-9. PubMed ID: 24382640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cryolipolysis for fat reduction and body contouring: safety and efficacy of current treatment paradigms.
    Ingargiola MJ; Motakef S; Chung MT; Vasconez HC; Sasaki GH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jun; 135(6):1581-1590. PubMed ID: 26017594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Noninvasive body contouring: cryolipolysis and ultrasound.
    Ortiz AE; Avram MM
    Semin Cutan Med Surg; 2015 Sep; 34(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 26566568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the Efficacy of Cryolipolysis on Abdominal Fat Deposits: A Prospective Study.
    Coiante E; Pensato R; Hadji I; Lo Giudice G; Pizza C; SidAhmed-Mezi M; D'Andrea F; Meningaud JP; Hersant B; La Padula S
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Dec; 47(6):2679-2686. PubMed ID: 37138191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Synergistic effects of cryolipolysis and shock waves for noninvasive body contouring.
    Ferraro GA; De Francesco F; Cataldo C; Rossano F; Nicoletti G; D'Andrea F
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Jun; 36(3):666-79. PubMed ID: 22042359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prototype CoolCup cryolipolysis applicator with over 40% reduced treatment time demonstrates equivalent safety and efficacy with greater patient preference.
    Kilmer SL
    Lasers Surg Med; 2017 Jan; 49(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 27327898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasound assessment of abdominal adipose panniculus in patients treated with a single session of cryolipolysis in a clinical setting.
    Ponga-Manso M
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2022 Jan; 21(1):307-315. PubMed ID: 34813151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of cryolipolysis on abdominal adiposity of women.
    Meyer PF; Furtado ACG; Morais SFT; de Araujo Neto LG; Valentim da Silva RM; Marcel R; Medeiros ML; Maciel de Queiroz CA
    Cryo Letters; 2017; 38(5):379-386. PubMed ID: 29734405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety and Efficacy of Bilateral Submental Cryolipolysis With Quantified 3-Dimensional Imaging of Fat Reduction and Skin Tightening.
    Bernstein EF; Bloom JD
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Sep; 19(5):350-357. PubMed ID: 28426847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safety and efficacy of cryolipolysis for non-invasive reduction of submental fat.
    Kilmer SL; Burns AJ; Zelickson BD
    Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Jan; 48(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 26607045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized double-blind trial evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of topical body treatment with TriHex Technology
    Moradi A; Poehler J; Bell M
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Mar; 19(3):677-681. PubMed ID: 32009299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Paradoxical adipose hyperplasia secondary to cryolipolysis: An underreported entity?
    Singh SM; Geddes ER; Boutrous SG; Galiano RD; Friedman PM
    Lasers Surg Med; 2015 Aug; 47(6):476-8. PubMed ID: 26096832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cryolipolysis: A promising nonsurgical technique for localized fat reduction.
    Kania B; Goldberg DJ
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2023 Nov; 22 Suppl 3():1-7. PubMed ID: 37988716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved methods for selective cryolipolysis results in subcutaneous fat layer reduction in a porcine model.
    Kwon TR; Yoo KH; Oh CT; Shin DH; Choi EJ; Jung SJ; Hong H; Choi YS; Kim BJ
    Skin Res Technol; 2015 May; 21(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 25220194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Prospective Study Determining Patient Satisfaction with Combined Cryolipolysis and Shockwave Therapy Treatment for Noninvasive Body Contouring.
    Michon A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Oct; 45(5):2317-2325. PubMed ID: 33515083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.