These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33395779)
41. Non-invasive tumescent cryolipolysis using a new 4D handpiece: a comparative study with a porcine model. Jeong SY; Kwon TR; Seok J; Park KY; Kim BJ Skin Res Technol; 2017 Feb; 23(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 27440551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Enhanced clinical outcome with manual massage following cryolipolysis treatment: a 4-month study of safety and efficacy. Boey GE; Wasilenchuk JL Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Jan; 46(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 24338439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Prospective Internally Controlled Blind Reviewed Clinical Evaluation of Cryolipolysis Combined With Multipolar Radiofrequency andVaripulseTechnology for Enhanced Subject Results in Circumferential Fat Reduction and Skin Laxity of the Flanks. Few J; Gold M; Sadick N J Drugs Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 15(11):1354-1358. PubMed ID: 28095547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Plastic Surgery and Cosmetic Procedures: Liposuction and Nonsurgical Fat Reduction Procedures. Nguyen TT FP Essent; 2020 Oct; 497():23-26. PubMed ID: 33021775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Effects of cryolipolysis on lower abdomen fat thickness of healthy women and patient satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial. Falster M; Schardong J; Santos DPD; Machado BC; Peres A; Rosa PVD; Plentz RDM Braz J Phys Ther; 2020; 24(5):441-448. PubMed ID: 31375459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Paradoxical adipose hyperplasia after noninvasive radiofrequency treatment: A novel report and review. Agochukwu-Nwubah N; Mentz H J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Apr; 19(4):866-868. PubMed ID: 31376204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effects of Radio Frequency and Ultrasound Cavitation Therapy on Serum C-reactive Protein and Pro-oxidant-Antioxidant Levels. Mohammadzadeh M; Nasrfard S; Nezafati P; Arabpour M; Ghaane N; Salehi M; Safarian M; Ghayour-Mobarhan M; Ferns GA; Norouzy A Arch Iran Med; 2016 May; 19(5):348-52. PubMed ID: 27179167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Active Heating following Cryolipolysis Reduces Efficacy and Side Effects: A Randomized Split-Body Trial. Dahmann S; Sanders A; Saarbeck C; Batsilas I; Meyer-Marcotty M Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Nov; 152(5):965-975. PubMed ID: 36877615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Adverse Events Associated With Cryolipolysis: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Hedayati B; Juhász M; Chu S; Mesinkovska NA Dermatol Surg; 2020 Oct; 46 Suppl 1():S8-S13. PubMed ID: 32976167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Multiple same day cryolipolysis treatments for the reduction of subcutaneous fat are safe and do not affect serum lipid levels or liver function tests. Klein KB; Bachelor EP; Becker EV; Bowes LE Lasers Surg Med; 2017 Sep; 49(7):640-644. PubMed ID: 28464272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Histologic effects of external ultrasound-assisted lipectomy on adipose tissue. Ferraro GA; De Francesco F; Nicoletti G; Rossano F; D'Andrea F Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2008 Jan; 32(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 17882478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Clinical Study Demonstrates that Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation Does Not Cause Injury to Fat Cells. Zachary CB; Burns AJ; Pham LD; Jimenez Lozano JN Lasers Surg Med; 2021 Jan; 53(1):70-78. PubMed ID: 32383824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. From Esthetic Medicine to Optimizing Reconstructive Outcome: A Feasibility Trial on Secondary Refinement of Fasciocutaneous Anterolateral Thigh Flaps with Cryolipolysis. Nagel SS; Rauh A; Siegwart LC; Hundeshagen G; Kotsougiani-Fischer D; Kuepper S; Kneser U; Hirche C J Reconstr Microsurg; 2023 Feb; 39(2):156-164. PubMed ID: 36150694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Adipose Hypertrophy Following Cryolipolysis. Stefani WA Aesthet Surg J; 2015 Sep; 35(7):NP218-20. PubMed ID: 26319083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Cryolipolysis for Noninvasive Contouring of the Periumbilical Abdomen With a Nonvacuum Conformable-Surface Applicator. Friedmann DP Dermatol Surg; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1185-1190. PubMed ID: 30672856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. High-intensity focused ultrasound treatment after cryolipolysis may be used to reduce pain: Two case report. Ko EJ; Kwon HJ; Kwon TR; Choi SY; Yoo KH; Kim BJ Dermatol Ther; 2018 Jul; 31(4):e12604. PubMed ID: 29644788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Long-term efficacy follow-up on two cryolipolysis case studies: 6 and 9 years post-treatment. Bernstein EF J Cosmet Dermatol; 2016 Dec; 15(4):561-564. PubMed ID: 27335309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Cryolipolysis for abdominal subcutaneous fat reduction: A prospective, multicenter, single arm, clinical study. Choi SY; Park JW; Koh YG; Jung YJ; Huh YJ; Ko EJ; Yoo KH; Seok J; Kim SY; Jue MS; Ko JY; Kim BJ Dermatol Ther; 2022 Sep; 35(9):e15717. PubMed ID: 35837791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Non-invasive fat reduction of the flanks using a new cryolipolysis applicator and overlapping, two-cycle treatments. Bernstein EF; Bloom JD; Basilavecchio LD; Plugis JM Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Dec; 46(10):731-5. PubMed ID: 25395266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]