BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33396008)

  • 1. Environmental risk assessment in agro-ecosystems: Revisiting the concept of receiving environment after the EFSA guidance document.
    Arpaia S
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2021 Jan; 208():111676. PubMed ID: 33396008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing environmental impacts of genetically modified plants on non-target organisms: The relevance of in planta studies.
    Arpaia S; Birch ANE; Kiss J; van Loon JJA; Messéan A; Nuti M; Perry JN; Sweet JB; Tebbe CC
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Apr; 583():123-132. PubMed ID: 28095991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Procedure to select test organisms for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops in aquatic systems.
    Hilbeck A; Bundschuh R; Bundschuh M; Hofmann F; Oehen B; Otto M; Schulz R; Trtikova M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Nov; 13(6):974-979. PubMed ID: 28755496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prioritizing stream types according to their potential risk to receive crop plant material--A GIS-based procedure to assist in the risk assessment of genetically modified crops and systemic insecticide residues.
    Bundschuh R; Kuhn U; Bundschuh M; Naegele C; Elsaesser D; Schlechtriemen U; Oehen B; Hilbeck A; Otto M; Schulz R; Hofmann F
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Mar; 547():226-233. PubMed ID: 26789360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transportable data from non-target arthropod field studies for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified maize expressing an insecticidal double-stranded RNA.
    Ahmad A; Negri I; Oliveira W; Brown C; Asiimwe P; Sammons B; Horak M; Jiang C; Carson D
    Transgenic Res; 2016 Feb; 25(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 26433587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biosafety of bee pollinators in genetically modified agro-ecosystems: Current approach and further development in the EU.
    Arpaia S; Smagghe G; Sweet JB
    Pest Manag Sci; 2021 Jun; 77(6):2659-2666. PubMed ID: 33470515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selection of focal earthworm species as non-target soil organisms for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants.
    van Capelle C; Schrader S; Arpaia S
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Apr; 548-549():360-369. PubMed ID: 26803734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potential use of an arthropod database to support the non-target risk assessment and monitoring of transgenic plants.
    Romeis J; Meissle M; Alvarez-Alfageme F; Bigler F; Bohan DA; Devos Y; Malone LA; Pons X; Rauschen S
    Transgenic Res; 2014 Dec; 23(6):995-1013. PubMed ID: 24633599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the use of untargeted metabolomics in the safety assessment of genetically modified crops.
    Bedair M; Glenn KC
    Metabolomics; 2020 Oct; 16(10):111. PubMed ID: 33037482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ecological impacts of genetically modified crops: ten years of field research and commercial cultivation.
    Sanvido O; Romeis J; Bigler F
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():235-78. PubMed ID: 17522828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Limits of Concern: suggestions for the operationalisation of a concept to determine the relevance of adverse effects in the ERA of GMOs.
    Dolezel M; Miklau M; Heissenberger A; Reichenbecher W
    Environ Sci Eur; 2018; 30(1):39. PubMed ID: 30416927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consideration of familiarity accumulated in the confined field trials for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified soybean (Glycine max) in Japan.
    Matsushita A; Goto H; Takahashi Y; Tsuda M; Ohsawa R
    Transgenic Res; 2020 Apr; 29(2):229-242. PubMed ID: 31997144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sources, pathways, and relative risks of contaminants in surface water and groundwater: a perspective prepared for the Walkerton inquiry.
    Ritter L; Solomon K; Sibley P; Hall K; Keen P; Mattu G; Linton B
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2002 Jan; 65(1):1-142. PubMed ID: 11809004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Plant characterization of genetically modified maize hybrids MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-88Ø17-3, MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6, and MON-ØØ6Ø3-6: alternatives for maize production in Mexico.
    Heredia Díaz O; Aldaba Meza JL; Baltazar BM; Bojórquez Bojórquez G; Castro Espinoza L; Corrales Madrid JL; de la Fuente Martínez JM; Durán Pompa HA; Alonso Escobedo J; Espinoza Banda A; Garzón Tiznado JA; González García J; Guzmán Rodríguez JL; Madueño Martínez JI; Martínez Carrillo JL; Meng C; Quiñones Pando FJ; Rosales Robles E; Ruiz Hernández I; Treviño Ramírez JE; Uribe Montes HR; Zavala García F
    Transgenic Res; 2017 Feb; 26(1):135-151. PubMed ID: 27771867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996-2013: Impacts on pesticide use and carbon emissions.
    Brookes G; Barfoot P
    GM Crops Food; 2015; 6(2):103-33. PubMed ID: 25760405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deriving criteria to select arthropod species for laboratory tests to assess the ecological risks from cultivating arthropod-resistant genetically engineered crops.
    Romeis J; Raybould A; Bigler F; Candolfi MP; Hellmich RL; Huesing JE; Shelton AM
    Chemosphere; 2013 Jan; 90(3):901-9. PubMed ID: 23062830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of risks to listed species from the use of atrazine in the USA: a perspective.
    Smith PN; Armbrust KL; Brain RA; Chen W; Galic N; Ghebremichael L; Giddings JM; Hanson ML; Maul J; Van Der Kraak G; Solomon KR
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2021 Aug; 24(6):223-306. PubMed ID: 34219616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Commercializing genetically modified crops under EU regulations: objectives and barriers.
    Raybould A; Poppy GM
    GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 22430852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transportability of confined field trial data from cultivation to import countries for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops.
    Nakai S; Hoshikawa K; Shimono A; Ohsawa R
    Transgenic Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):929-44. PubMed ID: 26138875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.