These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33396780)

  • 1. The Effect of Perioral Scan and Artificial Skin Markers on the Accuracy of Virtual Dentofacial Integration: Stereophotogrammetry Versus Smartphone Three-Dimensional Face-Scanning.
    Mai HN; Lee DH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 33396780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of Artificial Extraoral Markers on Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Dentofacial Image Integration: Smartphone Face Scan versus Stereophotogrammetry.
    Mai HN; Lee DH
    J Pers Med; 2022 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 35330489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison between stereophotogrammetry and smartphone structured light technology for three-dimensional face scanning.
    D'Ettorre G; Farronato M; Candida E; Quinzi V; Grippaudo C
    Angle Orthod; 2022 May; 92(3):358-363. PubMed ID: 35015071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of three-dimensional facial imaging captured with smartphone-based photogrammetry application in comparison to stereophotogrammetry system.
    Andrews J; Alwafi A; Bichu YM; Pliska BT; Mostafa N; Zou B
    Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e15834. PubMed ID: 37180897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of 3D facial scans: a comparison of three different scanning system in an in vivo study.
    Pellitteri F; Scisciola F; Cremonini F; Baciliero M; Lombardo L
    Prog Orthod; 2023 Dec; 24(1):44. PubMed ID: 38143253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Smartphone Application as a Low-Cost Alternative for Digitizing Facial Defects: Is It Accurate Enough for Clinical Application?
    Elbashti ME; Sumita YI; Aswehlee AM; Seelaus R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(6):541-543. PubMed ID: 31664272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A smartphone photogrammetry method for digitizing prosthetic socket interiors.
    Hernandez A; Lemaire E
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Apr; 41(2):210-214. PubMed ID: 27613588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and reliability of 3D stereophotogrammetry: A comparison to direct anthropometry and 2D photogrammetry.
    Dindaroğlu F; Kutlu P; Duran GS; Görgülü S; Aslan E
    Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 26267357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the Accuracy, Reliability, and Reproducibility of Two Different 3D Face-Scanning Systems.
    Ye H; Lv L; Liu Y; Liu Y; Zhou Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 27148978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and virtual validation of a novel digital workflow to rehabilitate palatal defects by using smartphone-integrated stereophotogrammetry (SPINS).
    Farook TH; Jamayet NB; Asif JA; Din AS; Mahyuddin MN; Alam MK
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8469. PubMed ID: 33875672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of Digital Impressions Obtained Using Six Intraoral Scanners in Partially Edentulous Dentitions and the Effect of Scanning Sequence.
    Diker B; Tak Ö
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(1):101-108. PubMed ID: 33570525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the accuracy of digital stereophotogrammetry and projection moiré profilometry for three-dimensional imaging of the face.
    Artopoulos A; Buytaert JA; Dirckx JJ; Coward TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 May; 43(5):654-62. PubMed ID: 24225265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional facial anatomy evaluation: Reliability of laser scanner consecutive scans procedure in comparison with stereophotogrammetry.
    Gibelli D; Pucciarelli V; Poppa P; Cummaudo M; Dolci C; Cattaneo C; Sforza C
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 46(10):1807-1813. PubMed ID: 30097408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of low-cost alternative facial scanners: a prospective cohort study.
    Bartella AK; Laser J; Kamal M; Krause M; Neuhaus M; Pausch NC; Sander AK; Lethaus B; Zimmerer R
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Mar; 27(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 35249150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of using an intraoral scanner for a complete-arch digital scan.
    Park GH; Son K; Lee KB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 30598314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity and reliability of three-dimensional modeling of orthodontic dental casts using smartphone-based photogrammetric technology.
    Al-Rudainy D; Adel Al-Lami H; Yang L
    J World Fed Orthod; 2023 Feb; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 36528481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3D facial and dento-alveolar imaging.
    Freezer S; Fricker J
    Aust Orthod J; 2017 Feb; Spec No():73-86. PubMed ID: 29709124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The accuracy of matching three-dimensional photographs with skin surfaces derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Maal TJ; Plooij JM; Rangel FA; Mollemans W; Schutyser FA; Bergé SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 18539435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and reproducibility of the DAVID SLS-2 scanner in three-dimensional facial imaging.
    Secher JJ; Darvann TA; Pinholt EM
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 45(10):1662-1670. PubMed ID: 28847623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of skin tone on the accuracy of hybrid and passive stereophotogrammetry.
    Wesselius TS; Verhulst AC; Xi T; Ulrich DJO; Maal TJJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Sep; 72(9):1564-1569. PubMed ID: 31229406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.