These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33396780)
21. Evaluation of a portable low-budget three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry system for nasal analysis. Ritschl LM; Grill FD; Mittermeier F; Lonic D; Wolff KD; Roth M; Loeffelbein DJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2008-2016. PubMed ID: 30322779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Method for Economical Smartphone-Based Clinical 3D Facial Scanning. Nightingale RC; Ross MT; Allenby MC; Woodruff MA; Powell SK J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):818-825. PubMed ID: 33089546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of capturing oncology facial defects with multimodal image fusion versus laser scanning. Jablonski RY; Osnes CA; Khambay BS; Nattress BR; Keeling AJ J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Sep; 122(3):333-338. PubMed ID: 30955940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of 3D Face-Scan images obtained by stereophotogrammetry and smartphone camera. Akan B; Akan E; Şahan AO; Kalak M Int Orthod; 2021 Dec; 19(4):669-678. PubMed ID: 34544662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Kim RJ; Park JM; Shim JS J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):895-903.e1. PubMed ID: 30006228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The virtual human face: superimposing the simultaneously captured 3D photorealistic skin surface of the face on the untextured skin image of the CBCT scan. Naudi KB; Benramadan R; Brocklebank L; Ju X; Khambay B; Ayoub A Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 42(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 23228692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of Different Modalities to Record Natural Head Position in 3 Dimensions: A Systematic Review. Leung MY; Lo J; Leung YY J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 74(11):2261-2284. PubMed ID: 27235181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validation of a technique for integration of a digital dental model into stereophotogrammetric images of the face using cone-beam computed tomographic data. Codari M; Pucciarelli V; Tommasi DG; Sforza C Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 54(5):584-6. PubMed ID: 26852270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner. Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 31860144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Facial scanning technologies in the era of digital workflow: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Antonacci D; Caponio VCA; Troiano G; Pompeo MG; Gianfreda F; Canullo L J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Jul; 67(3):321-336. PubMed ID: 36058870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reducing cone beam CT scan height as a method of radiation reduction for photorealistic three-dimensional orthognathic planning. Lin CY; Hsung TC; Khambay B J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 43(6):907-12. PubMed ID: 25976036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. Nedelcu RG; Persson AS J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1461-71. PubMed ID: 25134995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reliability and validity of handheld structured light scanners and a static stereophotogrammetry system in facial three-dimensional surface imaging. Schipper JAM; Merema BJ; Hollander MHJ; Spijkervet FKL; Dijkstra PU; Jansma J; Schepers RH; Kraeima J Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8172. PubMed ID: 38589391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy Evaluation of a Three-Dimensional Model Generated from Patient-Specific Monocular Video Data for Maxillofacial Prosthetic Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study. Matsuo M; Mine Y; Kawahara K; Murayama T J Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 29(8):712-717. PubMed ID: 32583571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Noninvasive computerized scanning method for the correlation between the facial soft and hard tissues for an integrated three-dimensional anthropometry and cephalometry. Galantucci LM; Percoco G; Lavecchia F; Di Gioia E J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):797-804. PubMed ID: 23714883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Frugal 3D scanning using smartphones provides an accessible framework for capturing the external ear. Nightingale RC; Ross MT; Cruz RLJ; Allenby MC; Powell SK; Woodruff MA J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Nov; 74(11):3066-3072. PubMed ID: 34088646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners. Lee JJ; Jeong ID; Park JY; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim WC J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):253-259. PubMed ID: 27666500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Smartphone-Based Facial Scanning as a Viable Tool for Facially Driven Orthodontics? Thurzo A; Strunga M; Havlínová R; Reháková K; Urban R; Surovková J; Kurilová V Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies. González de Villaumbrosia P; Martínez-Rus F; García-Orejas A; Salido MP; Pradíes G J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):543-550.e1. PubMed ID: 27112413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]