BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33397914)

  • 1. Rapid parallel adaptation despite gene flow in silent crickets.
    Zhang X; Rayner JG; Blaxter M; Bailey NW
    Nat Commun; 2021 Jan; 12(1):50. PubMed ID: 33397914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid convergent evolution in wild crickets.
    Pascoal S; Cezard T; Eik-Nes A; Gharbi K; Majewska J; Payne E; Ritchie MG; Zuk M; Bailey NW
    Curr Biol; 2014 Jun; 24(12):1369-1374. PubMed ID: 24881880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid evolutionary change in a sexual signal: genetic control of the mutation 'flatwing' that renders male field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) mute.
    Tinghitella RM
    Heredity (Edinb); 2008 Mar; 100(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 18000520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid evolution and gene expression: a rapidly evolving Mendelian trait that silences field crickets has widespread effects on mRNA and protein expression.
    Pascoal S; Liu X; Ly T; Fang Y; Rockliffe N; Paterson S; Shirran SL; Botting CH; Bailey NW
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jun; 29(6):1234-46. PubMed ID: 26999731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct and indirect effects of sexual signal loss on female reproduction in the Pacific field cricket (Teleogryllus oceanicus).
    Heinen-Kay JL; Strub DB; Balenger SL; Zuk M
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Dec; 32(12):1382-1390. PubMed ID: 31495021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal genomics in Hawaiian crickets reveals compensatory intragenomic coadaptation during adaptive evolution.
    Zhang X; Blaxter M; Wood JMD; Tracey A; McCarthy S; Thorpe P; Rayner JG; Zhang S; Sikkink KL; Balenger SL; Bailey NW
    Nat Commun; 2024 Jun; 15(1):5001. PubMed ID: 38866741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual signal loss: The link between behaviour and rapid evolutionary dynamics in a field cricket.
    Zuk M; Bailey NW; Gray B; Rotenberry JT
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 May; 87(3):623-633. PubMed ID: 29417997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can behaviour impede evolution? Persistence of singing effort after morphological song loss in crickets.
    Rayner JG; Schneider WT; Bailey NW
    Biol Lett; 2020 Jun; 16(6):20190931. PubMed ID: 32544378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Silent night: adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets.
    Zuk M; Rotenberry JT; Tinghitella RM
    Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):521-4. PubMed ID: 17148278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased socially mediated plasticity in gene expression accompanies rapid adaptive evolution.
    Pascoal S; Liu X; Fang Y; Paterson S; Ritchie MG; Rockliffe N; Zuk M; Bailey NW
    Ecol Lett; 2018 Apr; 21(4):546-556. PubMed ID: 29441668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing the role of trait reversal in evolutionary diversification using song loss in wild crickets.
    Bailey NW; Pascoal S; Montealegre-Z F
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Apr; 116(18):8941-8949. PubMed ID: 30992379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexual signal loss in field crickets maintained despite strong sexual selection favoring singing males.
    Tanner JC; Swanger E; Zuk M
    Evolution; 2019 Jul; 73(7):1482-1489. PubMed ID: 31243769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Obligately silent males sire more offspring than singers in a rapidly evolving cricket population.
    Heinen-Kay JL; Urquhart EM; Zuk M
    Biol Lett; 2019 Jul; 15(7):20190198. PubMed ID: 31362608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Field cricket genome reveals the footprint of recent, abrupt adaptation in the wild.
    Pascoal S; Risse JE; Zhang X; Blaxter M; Cezard T; Challis RJ; Gharbi K; Hunt J; Kumar S; Langan E; Liu X; Rayner JG; Ritchie MG; Snoek BL; Trivedi U; Bailey NW
    Evol Lett; 2020 Feb; 4(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 32055408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Replicated evolutionary divergence in the cuticular hydrocarbon profile of male crickets associated with the loss of song in the Hawaiian archipelago.
    Simmons LW; Thomas ML; Gray B; Zuk M
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Oct; 27(10):2249-57. PubMed ID: 25228329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asymmetric mating preferences accommodated the rapid evolutionary loss of a sexual signal.
    Tinghitella RM; Zuk M
    Evolution; 2009 Aug; 63(8):2087-98. PubMed ID: 19473387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual signal loss, pleiotropy, and maintenance of a male reproductive polymorphism in crickets.
    Heinen-Kay JL; Nichols RE; Zuk M
    Evolution; 2020 May; 74(5):1002-1009. PubMed ID: 32187385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vestigial singing behaviour persists after the evolutionary loss of song in crickets.
    Schneider WT; Rutz C; Hedwig B; Bailey NW
    Biol Lett; 2018 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 29445043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Island hopping introduces Polynesian field crickets to novel environments, genetic bottlenecks and rapid evolution.
    Tinghitella RM; Zuk M; Beveridge M; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Jun; 24(6):1199-211. PubMed ID: 21418117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel cricket morph has diverged in song and wing morphology across island populations.
    Gallagher JH; Zonana DM; Broder ED; Syammach AM; Tinghitella RM
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Nov; 36(11):1609-1617. PubMed ID: 37885146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.