BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33398394)

  • 1. Electrocoagulation for Arsenic Removal: Field Trials in Rural West Bengal.
    Dutta N; Haldar A; Gupta A
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2021 Jan; 80(1):248-258. PubMed ID: 33398394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Formation of macroscopic surface layers on Fe(0) electrocoagulation electrodes during an extended field trial of arsenic treatment.
    van Genuchten CM; Bandaru SR; Surorova E; Amrose SE; Gadgil AJ; Peña J
    Chemosphere; 2016 Jun; 153():270-9. PubMed ID: 27018519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Arsenic Removal from Groundwater by Solar Driven Inline-Electrolytic Induced Co-Precipitation and Filtration-A Long Term Field Test Conducted in West Bengal.
    Otter P; Malakar P; Jana BB; Grischek T; Benz F; Goldmaier A; Feistel U; Jana J; Lahiri S; Alvarez JA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Oct; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 28974053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term electrode behavior during treatment of arsenic contaminated groundwater by a pilot-scale iron electrocoagulation system.
    Bandaru SRS; Roy A; Gadgil AJ; van Genuchten CM
    Water Res; 2020 May; 175():115668. PubMed ID: 32163769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Arsenic and iron removal from groundwater by oxidation-coagulation at optimized pH: laboratory and field studies.
    Bordoloi S; Nath SK; Gogoi S; Dutta RK
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Sep; 260():618-26. PubMed ID: 23827730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of arsenic removal efficiency by an iron oxide-coated sand filter process.
    Callegari A; Ferronato N; Rada EC; Capodaglio AG; Torretta V
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Sep; 25(26):26135-26143. PubMed ID: 29971744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A cost-effective system for in-situ geological arsenic adsorption from groundwater.
    Shan H; Ma T; Wang Y; Zhao J; Han H; Deng Y; He X; Dong Y
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Nov; 154():1-9. PubMed ID: 24035830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Well-head arsenic removal units in remote villages of Indian subcontinent: field results and performance evaluation.
    Sarkar S; Gupta A; Biswas RK; Deb AK; Greenleaf JE; Sengupta AK
    Water Res; 2005 May; 39(10):2196-206. PubMed ID: 15913703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Arsenic remediation of drinking water using iron-oxide coated coal bottom ash.
    Mathieu JL; Gadgil AJ; Addy SE; Kowolik K
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2010 Sep; 45(11):1446-60. PubMed ID: 20694883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simultaneous removal of arsenic and fluoride from groundwater by coagulation-adsorption with polyaluminum chloride.
    Ingallinella AM; Pacini VA; Fernández RG; Vidoni RM; Sanguinetti G
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2011; 46(11):1288-96. PubMed ID: 21879862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abatement of hydrated silica, arsenic, and coexisting ions from groundwater by electrocoagulation using iron electrodes.
    Valentín-Reyes J; Trejo DB; Coreño O; Nava JL
    Chemosphere; 2022 Jun; 297():134144. PubMed ID: 35227747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pilot study on arsenic removal from groundwater using a small-scale reverse osmosis system-Towards sustainable drinking water production.
    Schmidt SA; Gukelberger E; Hermann M; Fiedler F; Großmann B; Hoinkis J; Ghosh A; Chatterjee D; Bundschuh J
    J Hazard Mater; 2016 Nov; 318():671-678. PubMed ID: 27497227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selective removal of arsenic and monovalent ions from brackish water reverse osmosis concentrate.
    Xu P; Capito M; Cath TY
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Sep; 260():885-91. PubMed ID: 23892312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simultaneous arsenic and fluoride removal from synthetic and real groundwater by electrocoagulation process: Parametric and cost evaluation.
    Thakur LS; Mondal P
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Apr; 190():102-112. PubMed ID: 28040586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of treated laterite as arsenic adsorbent from different locations and performance of best filter under field conditions.
    Maiti A; Thakur BK; Basu JK; De S
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Nov; 262():1176-86. PubMed ID: 22785008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phosphate interference during in situ treatment for arsenic in groundwater.
    Brunsting JH; McBean EA
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2014; 49(6):671-8. PubMed ID: 24521412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electro-chemical arsenic remediation: field trials in West Bengal.
    Amrose SE; Bandaru SR; Delaire C; van Genuchten CM; Dutta A; DebSarkar A; Orr C; Roy J; Das A; Gadgil AJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Aug; 488-489():539-46. PubMed ID: 24355249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of water chemistry on arsenic removal from drinking water by electrocoagulation.
    Wan W; Pepping TJ; Banerji T; Chaudhari S; Giammar DE
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(1):384-92. PubMed ID: 20800261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Removal of hydrated silica, fluoride and arsenic from groundwater by electrocoagulation using a continuous reactor with a twelve-cell stack.
    Rosales M; Coreño O; Nava JL
    Chemosphere; 2018 Nov; 211():149-155. PubMed ID: 30071426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Removing arsenic from groundwater in Cambodia using high performance iron adsorbent.
    Kang Y; Takeda R; Nada A; Thavarith L; Tang S; Nuki K; Sakurai K
    Environ Monit Assess; 2014 Sep; 186(9):5605-16. PubMed ID: 24894910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.