These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33398785)

  • 61. Do older adults show less confidence in their monitoring of learning?
    Serra MJ; Dunlosky J; Hertzog C
    Exp Aging Res; 2008; 34(4):379-91. PubMed ID: 18726751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Is retrieval the key? Metamemory judgment and testing as learning strategies.
    Akdoğan E; Izaute M; Danion JM; Vidailhet P; Bacon E
    Memory; 2016 Nov; 24(10):1390-5. PubMed ID: 26606714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Do metacognitive judgments alter memory performance beyond the benefits of retrieval practice? A comment on and replication attempt of Dougherty, Scheck, Nelson, and Narens (2005).
    Dougherty MR; Robey AM; Buttaccio D
    Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):558-565. PubMed ID: 29368228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Revisiting von Restorff's early isolation effect.
    Schmidt SR; Schmidt CR
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Feb; 45(2):194-207. PubMed ID: 27631791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice.
    Koriat A; Sheffer L; Ma'ayan H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 12049237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Can very small font size enhance memory?
    Halamish V
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):979-993. PubMed ID: 29725876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Predicting memory benefits in the production effect: the use and misuse of self-generated distinctive cues when making judgments of learning.
    Castel AD; Rhodes MG; Friedman MC
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Jan; 41(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 22915315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Misleading emotions: judgments of learning overestimate recognition of negative and positive emotional images.
    Hourihan KL
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Jun; 34(4):771-782. PubMed ID: 31637957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Distinctive items are salient during encoding: delayed judgements of learning predict the isolation effect.
    Geraci L; Manzano I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 19370485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Judgments of learning reactively facilitate visual memory by enhancing learning engagement.
    Shi A; Xu C; Zhao W; Shanks DR; Hu X; Luo L; Yang C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Apr; 30(2):676-687. PubMed ID: 36109421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A meta-analysis and systematic review of reactivity to judgements of learning.
    Double KS; Birney DP; Walker SA
    Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):741-750. PubMed ID: 29161973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Functional and Pathological Correlates of Judgments of Learning in Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults.
    d'Oleire Uquillas F; Jacobs HIL; Schultz AP; Hanseeuw BJ; Buckley RF; Sepulcre J; Pascual-Leone A; Donovan NJ; Johnson KA; Sperling RA; Vannini P
    Cereb Cortex; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1974-1983. PubMed ID: 31696223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Identity priming consistently affects perceptual fluency but only affects metamemory when primes are obvious.
    Susser JA; Jin A; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(4):657-62. PubMed ID: 26371493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.
    Tiede HL; Leboe JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Bodily Effort Enhances Learning and Metacognition: Investigating the Relation Between Physical Effort and Cognition Using Dual-Process Models of Embodiment.
    Skulmowski A; Rey GD
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2017; 13(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 28439318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Does delaying judgments of learning really improve the efficacy of study decisions? Not so much.
    Kimball DR; Smith TA; Muntean WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):923-54. PubMed ID: 22250913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Stability and consistency of metamemory judgments within a session.
    Yeung MK
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():917576. PubMed ID: 36072052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Study for now, but judge for later: delayed judgments of learning promote long-term retention.
    Sundqvist ML; Todorov I; Kubik V; Jönsson FU
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Dec; 53(6):450-4. PubMed ID: 22897518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
    Jang Y; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Metamemory in temporal lobe epilepsy: a study of sensitivity to repetition at encoding.
    Howard CE; Andrés P; Mazzoni G
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2013 Apr; 19(4):453-62. PubMed ID: 23406983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.