These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33398899)

  • 1. Extending the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon rank sum test to survey data for comparing mean ranks.
    Lin T; Chen T; Liu J; Tu XM
    Stat Med; 2021 Mar; 40(7):1705-1717. PubMed ID: 33398899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Causal inference for Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon rank sum and other nonparametric statistics.
    Wu P; Han Y; Chen T; Tu XM
    Stat Med; 2014 Apr; 33(8):1261-71. PubMed ID: 24132928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Case for omitting tied observations in the two-sample t-test and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test.
    McGee M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200837. PubMed ID: 30040850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confidence intervals of the Mann-Whitney parameter that are compatible with the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
    Fay MP; Malinovsky Y
    Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(27):3991-4006. PubMed ID: 29984411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal sample size planning for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
    Happ M; Bathke AC; Brunner E
    Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(3):363-375. PubMed ID: 30298671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of profile-likelihood-based confidence intervals with other rank-based methods for the two-sample problem in ordered categorical data.
    Funatogawa I; Funatogawa T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2023 May; 33(3):371-385. PubMed ID: 36533908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unadjusted Bivariate Two-Group Comparisons: When Simpler is Better.
    Vetter TR; Mascha EJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jan; 126(1):338-342. PubMed ID: 29189214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modified Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test and Power against Strong Null.
    Fong Y; Huang Y
    Am Stat; 2019; 73(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 30899120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Causal estimands and confidence intervals associated with Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests in randomized experiments.
    Fay MP; Brittain EH; Shih JH; Follmann DA; Gabriel EE
    Stat Med; 2018 Sep; 37(20):2923-2937. PubMed ID: 29774591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A U-statistics based approach to sample size planning of two-arm trials with discrete outcome criterion aiming to establish either superiority or noninferiority.
    Wellek S
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(5):799-812. PubMed ID: 27878839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power and sample size estimation for the Wilcoxon rank sum test with application to comparisons of C statistics from alternative prediction models.
    Rosner B; Glynn RJ
    Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):188-97. PubMed ID: 18510654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Power and sample size calculations for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test in the presence of death-censored observations.
    Matsouaka RA; Betensky RA
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(3):406-31. PubMed ID: 25393385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exact and Monte carlo resampling procedures for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
    Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):749-54. PubMed ID: 11153842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Power and sample size evaluation for the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel mean score (Wilcoxon rank sum) test and the Cochran-Armitage test for trend.
    Lachin JM
    Stat Med; 2011 Nov; 30(25):3057-66. PubMed ID: 22006667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incorporation of clustering effects for the Wilcoxon rank sum test: a large-sample approach.
    Rosner B; Glynn RJ; Lee ML
    Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):1089-98. PubMed ID: 14969489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical grand rounds: a review of analysis and sample size calculation considerations for Wilcoxon tests.
    Divine G; Norton HJ; Hunt R; Dienemann J
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Sep; 117(3):699-710. PubMed ID: 23456667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test under scrutiny.
    Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(10):1487-97. PubMed ID: 19247980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Power comparisons of significance tests of location using scores, ranks, and modular ranks.
    Zimmerman DW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):233-43. PubMed ID: 21492130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extending the DeLong algorithm for comparing areas under correlated receiver operating characteristic curves with missing data.
    Zou L; Choi YH; Guizzetti L; Shu D; Zou J; Zou G
    Stat Med; 2024 Sep; 43(21):4148-4162. PubMed ID: 39013403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A rank-sum test for clustered data when the number of subjects in a group within a cluster is informative.
    Dutta S; Datta S
    Biometrics; 2016 Jun; 72(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 26575695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.