These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33398915)

  • 1. The Effect of Evidential Impact on Perceptual Probabilistic Judgments.
    Mangiarulo M; Pighin S; Polonio L; Tentori K
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jan; 45(1):e12919. PubMed ID: 33398915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Judging the Probability of Hypotheses Versus the Impact of Evidence: Which Form of Inductive Inference Is More Accurate and Time-Consistent?
    Tentori K; Chater N; Crupi V
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Apr; 40(3):758-78. PubMed ID: 26100936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double Conjunction Fallacies in Physicians' Probability Judgment.
    Crupi V; Elia F; Aprà F; Tentori K
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):756-760. PubMed ID: 29978726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dependencies in evidential reports: The case for informational advantages.
    Pilditch TD; Hahn U; Fenton N; Lagnado D
    Cognition; 2020 Nov; 204():104343. PubMed ID: 32599310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Local spatial distortion caused by simple geometrical figures.
    Aksentijevic A; Elliott MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1535-1548. PubMed ID: 27244533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of target group size on risk judgments and comparative optimism: the more, the riskier.
    Price PC; Smith AR; Lench HC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Mar; 90(3):382-98. PubMed ID: 16594826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are Jurors Intuitive Statisticians? Bayesian Causal Reasoning in Legal Contexts.
    Shengelia T; Lagnado D
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():519262. PubMed ID: 33613348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beliefs and Bayesian reasoning.
    Cohen AL; Sidlowski S; Staub A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):972-978. PubMed ID: 27604495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Grammaticality, Acceptability, and Probability: A Probabilistic View of Linguistic Knowledge.
    Lau JH; Clark A; Lappin S
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Jul; 41(5):1202-1241. PubMed ID: 27732744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The base rate neglect in episodic memory.
    Lu Y; Nieznański M
    Memory; 2020 Feb; 28(2):270-277. PubMed ID: 31910728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facilitating normative judgments of conditional probability: frequency or nested sets?
    Yamagishi K
    Exp Psychol; 2003; 50(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 12693194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.
    Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM; Franco R; Trueblood JS
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):193-218. PubMed ID: 21480739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Asking better questions: How presentation formats influence information search.
    Wu CM; Meder B; Filimon F; Nelson JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1274-1297. PubMed ID: 28318286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Different developmental patterns of simple deductive and probabilistic inferential reasoning.
    Markovits H; Thompson V
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1066-78. PubMed ID: 18927025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probability judgment in three-category classification learning.
    Koehler DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jan; 26(1):28-52. PubMed ID: 10682289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Missing the dog that failed to bark in the nighttime: on the overestimation of occurrences over non-occurrences in hypothesis testing.
    Cherubini P; Rusconi P; Russo S; Crippa F
    Psychol Res; 2013 May; 77(3):348-70. PubMed ID: 22415224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Judgments during perceptual comparisons predict distinct forms of memory updating.
    Saito JM; Bae GY; Fukuda K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jan; 153(1):38-55. PubMed ID: 37650822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deductive updating is not Bayesian.
    Markovits H; Brisson J; de Chantal PL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):949-56. PubMed ID: 25603167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity to Evidential Dependencies in Judgments Under Uncertainty.
    Xie B; Hayes B
    Cogn Sci; 2022 May; 46(5):e13144. PubMed ID: 35579865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.