These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. When alternative hypotheses shape your beliefs: Context effects in probability judgments. Cai X; Pleskac TJ Cognition; 2023 Feb; 231():105306. PubMed ID: 36379148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Implications of cognitive load for hypothesis generation and probability judgment. Sprenger AM; Dougherty MR; Atkins SM; Franco-Watkins AM; Thomas RP; Lange N; Abbs B Front Psychol; 2011; 2():129. PubMed ID: 21734897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dilution and confirmation of probability judgments based on nondiagnostic evidence. LaBella C; Koehler DJ Mem Cognit; 2004 Oct; 32(7):1076-89. PubMed ID: 15813491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Rapid Processing of a Global Feature in the ON Visual Pathways of Behaving Monkeys. Huang J; Yang Y; Zhou K; Zhao X; Zhou Q; Zhu H; Yang Y; Zhang C; Zhou Y; Zhou W Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():474. PubMed ID: 28890683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Quantum Geometric Framework for Modeling Color Similarity Judgments. Epping GP; Fisher EL; Zeleznikow-Johnston AM; Pothos EM; Tsuchiya N Cogn Sci; 2023 Jan; 47(1):e13231. PubMed ID: 36655940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Effect of Information Formats and Incidental Affect on Prior and Posterior Probability Judgments. Armstrong BA; Sparrow EP; Spaniol J Med Decis Making; 2020 Jul; 40(5):680-692. PubMed ID: 32659157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Fostering the Understanding of Positive Test Results. Pighin S; Tentori K; Savadori L; Girotto V Ann Behav Med; 2018 Oct; 52(11):909-919. PubMed ID: 30346498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Processing Probability Information in Nonnumerical Settings - Teachers' Bayesian and Non-bayesian Strategies During Diagnostic Judgment. Leuders T; Loibl K Front Psychol; 2020; 11():678. PubMed ID: 32719627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Hypothesis generation, probability judgment, and individual differences in working memory capacity. Dougherty MR; Hunter JE Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Jul; 113(3):263-82. PubMed ID: 12834999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Context Effects in the Judgment of Visual Relative-Frequency: Trial-by-Trial Adaptation and Non-linear Sequential Effect. Ren X; Wang M; Zhang H Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1691. PubMed ID: 30258383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Broadening the study of inductive reasoning: confirmation judgments with uncertain evidence. Mastropasqua T; Crupi V; Tentori K Mem Cognit; 2010 Oct; 38(7):941-50. PubMed ID: 20921106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The curious anomaly of skewed judgment distributions and systematic error in the wisdom of crowds. Nash UW PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112386. PubMed ID: 25406078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evidence evaluation: measure Z corresponds to human utility judgments better than measure L and optimal-experimental-design models. Rusconi P; Marelli M; D'Addario M; Russo S; Cherubini P J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):703-23. PubMed ID: 24446753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Occupational exposure decisions: can limited data interpretation training help improve accuracy? Logan P; Ramachandran G; Mulhausen J; Hewett P Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Jun; 53(4):311-24. PubMed ID: 19332428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]