872 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33398951)
1. [Variations of gut microbiome composition under different preservation solutions and periods].
Duan Y; Lü N; Cai F; Zhu B
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2020 Dec; 36(12):2525-2540. PubMed ID: 33398951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study.
Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Stool Sample Preservation Methods on Gut Microbiota Biodiversity: New Original Data and Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Li XM; Shi X; Yao Y; Shen YC; Wu XL; Cai T; Liang LX; Wang F
Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Jun; 11(3):e0429722. PubMed ID: 37093040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studies.
Isokääntä H; Tomnikov N; Vanhatalo S; Munukka E; Huovinen P; Hakanen AJ; Kallonen T
Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e0293223. PubMed ID: 38747618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles.
Liang Y; Dong T; Chen M; He L; Wang T; Liu X; Chang H; Mao JH; Hang B; Snijders AM; Xia Y
mSphere; 2020 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 31915218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.
Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK
Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of sampling and storage procedures on preserving the community structure of stool microbiota: A simple at-home toilet-paper collection method.
Al KF; Bisanz JE; Gloor GB; Reid G; Burton JP
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():117-121. PubMed ID: 29155236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Analysis of the dynamic changes in gut microbiota in patients with extremely severe burns by 16S ribosomal RNA high-throughput sequencing technology].
Pan YY; Fan YF; Li JL; Cui SY; Huang N; Jin GY; Chen C; Zhang C
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2020 Dec; 36(12):1159-1166. PubMed ID: 33379852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Alterations in the diversity and composition of mice gut microbiota by lytic or temperate gut phage treatment.
Bao HD; Pang MD; Olaniran A; Zhang XH; Zhang H; Zhou Y; Sun LC; Schmidt S; Wang R
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Dec; 102(23):10219-10230. PubMed ID: 30302521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of time and temperature on gut microbiota and SCFA composition in stool samples.
Cunningham JL; Bramstång L; Singh A; Jayarathna S; Rasmusson AJ; Moazzami A; Müller B
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236944. PubMed ID: 32745090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of room temperature transport vials on DNA quality and phylogenetic composition of faecal microbiota of elderly adults and infants.
Hill CJ; Brown JR; Lynch DB; Jeffery IB; Ryan CA; Ross RP; Stanton C; O'Toole PW
Microbiome; 2016 May; 4(1):19. PubMed ID: 27160322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance comparison of fecal preservative and stock solutions for gut microbiome storage at room temperature.
Park C; Yun KE; Chu JM; Lee JY; Hong CP; Nam YD; Jeong J; Han K; Ahn YJ
J Microbiol; 2020 Aug; 58(8):703-710. PubMed ID: 32583287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Establishment of a Standard Tongue Coating Collection Method for Microbiome Studies.
Zeng X; Jin H; Wang C; Li M; Wang R; Li W; Lin F; Chen Y; Chen W; Huang X; Liu J; Zheng M; Jiang X; Chen Q
Biopreserv Biobank; 2023 Dec; 21(6):599-609. PubMed ID: 36730760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants.
Ramamoorthy S; Levy S; Mohamed M; Abdelghani A; Evans AM; Miller LAD; Mehta L; Moore S; Freinkman E; Hourigan SK
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):59. PubMed ID: 33618670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative methods for fecal sample storage to preserve gut microbial structure and function in an in vitro model of the human colon.
Deschamps C; Fournier E; Uriot O; Lajoie F; Verdier C; Comtet-Marre S; Thomas M; Kapel N; Cherbuy C; Alric M; Almeida M; Etienne-Mesmin L; Blanquet-Diot S
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2020 Dec; 104(23):10233-10247. PubMed ID: 33085024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Preservation Method and 16S rRNA Hypervariable Region on Gut Microbiota Profiling.
Chen Z; Hui PC; Hui M; Yeoh YK; Wong PY; Chan MCW; Wong MCS; Ng SC; Chan FKL; Chan PKS
mSystems; 2019; 4(1):. PubMed ID: 30834331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cryopreservation of stool samples altered the microbial viability quantitively and compositionally.
Chen A; Hu Y; Zhang Y; Li Z; Zeng Y; Pang X
Arch Microbiol; 2022 Aug; 204(9):557. PubMed ID: 35972563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Storage and handling of human faecal samples affect the gut microbiome composition: A feasibility study.
Ezzy AC; Hagstrom AD; George C; Hamlin AS; Pereg L; Murphy AJ; Winter G
J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Sep; 164():105668. PubMed ID: 31302202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of stool versus rectal swab samples and storage conditions on bacterial community profiles.
Bassis CM; Moore NM; Lolans K; Seekatz AM; Weinstein RA; Young VB; Hayden MK;
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28359329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
