These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33399492)

  • 21. Research integrity and publication ethics.
    Beisiegel U
    Atherosclerosis; 2010 Oct; 212(2):383-5. PubMed ID: 20692660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identity Theft in the Academic World Leads to Junk Science.
    Dadkhah M; Lagzian M; Borchardt G
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Feb; 24(1):287-290. PubMed ID: 28074375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
    Fox MF; Braxton JM
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships.
    Anderson MS; Ronning EA; De Vries R; Martinson BC
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2007 Dec; 13(4):437-61. PubMed ID: 18030595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Acid Test for Biological Science: STAP Cells, Trust, and Replication.
    Lancaster C
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):147-67. PubMed ID: 25649070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Academic nightmares: Predatory publishing.
    Van Nuland SE; Rogers KA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jul; 10(4):392-394. PubMed ID: 27911990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cheating in science and publishing.
    Altman LK
    CBE Views; 1981; 4(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 11649550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Misconduct in science is not rare, a survey finds.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11647007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lack of involvement of medical writers and the pharmaceutical industry in publications retracted for misconduct: a systematic, controlled, retrospective study.
    Woolley KL; Lew RA; Stretton S; Ely JA; Bramich NJ; Keys JR; Monk JA; Woolley MJ
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Jun; 27(6):1175-82. PubMed ID: 21473670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Allocating credit and blame in science.
    Chubin DE
    Sci Technol Human Values; 1988; 13(1-2):53-63. PubMed ID: 11650139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Publishing as an Indicator of Scientific Research Quality and Ethics: The Case of Law Journals from Moldova.
    Moldoveanu B; Cuciureanu G
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Apr; 26(2):1039-1052. PubMed ID: 32040831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The process of publication.
    Koshland DE
    Science; 1989 Aug; 245(4918):573. PubMed ID: 11644383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bias in science and medical knowledge: the Opren controversy.
    Abraham J
    Sociology; 1994 Aug; 28(3):717-36. PubMed ID: 11658101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retractions of scientific publications: responsibility and accountability.
    Katavić V
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2014; 24(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 24969915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predatory journals: The rise of worthless biomedical science.
    Sharma H; Verma S
    J Postgrad Med; 2018; 64(4):226-231. PubMed ID: 30306968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
    Lang S
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An Ethics of the System: Talking to Scientists About Research Integrity.
    Davies SR
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1235-1253. PubMed ID: 30251235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On the hazards of whistleblowers and on some problems of young biomedical scientists in our time.
    Edsall JT
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Oct; 1(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 11657783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Publication misconduct: Perceptions of participants of a faculty development programme.
    Singh SP; Dhir SK; Sharma M; Singh T
    Natl Med J India; 2018; 31(3):169-171. PubMed ID: 31044767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Deceit in science: does it really matter?
    Birch AJ
    Interdiscip Sci Rev; 1990 Dec; 15(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 11651223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.