These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33399579)

  • 61. Quantitative comparison between two phase contrast techniques: diffraction enhanced imaging and phase propagation imaging.
    Pagot E; Fiedler S; Cloetens P; Bravin A; Coan P; Fezzaa K; Baruchel J; Härtwig J; von Smitten K; Leidenius M; Karjalainen-Lindsberg ML; Keyriläinen J
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Feb; 50(4):709-24. PubMed ID: 15773629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Comparative performance analysis for abdominal phantom ROI detectability according to CT reconstruction algorithm: ADMIRE.
    Shin JB; Yoon DK; Pak S; Kwon YH; Suh TS
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 31729832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Optimization of image recording distances for quantitative X-ray in-line phase contrast imaging.
    Ren Y; Chen C; Chen R; Zhou G; Wang Y; Xiao T
    Opt Express; 2011 Feb; 19(5):4170-81. PubMed ID: 21369246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
    Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Physical phantom studies of helical cone-beam CT with exact reconstruction.
    Tan J; Li HH; Klein E; Li H; Parikh P; Yang D
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4695-704. PubMed ID: 22894394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A new automated assessment method for contrast-detail images by applying support vector machine and its robustness to nonlinear image processing.
    Takei T; Ikeda M; Imai K; Yamauchi-Kawaura C; Kato K; Isoda H
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2013 Sep; 36(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 23955765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Computerized tomography based on DEI refraction information.
    Sun Y; Zhu P; Yu J; Chen X
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Sep; 31(6):383-9. PubMed ID: 17428637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. An effective method to verify line and point spread functions measured in computed tomography.
    Ohkubo M; Wada S; Matsumoto T; Nishizawa K
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2757-64. PubMed ID: 16964851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Penalized weighted least-squares approach to sinogram noise reduction and image reconstruction for low-dose X-ray computed tomography.
    Wang J; Li T; Lu H; Liang Z
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Oct; 25(10):1272-83. PubMed ID: 17024831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Quantitative image-based spectral reconstruction for computed tomography.
    Heismann B; Balda M
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4471-85. PubMed ID: 19928078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Noise in x-ray grating-based phase-contrast imaging.
    Weber T; Bartl P; Bayer F; Durst J; Haas W; Michel T; Ritter A; Anton G
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4133-40. PubMed ID: 21859014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Novel ultrahigh resolution data acquisition and image reconstruction for multi-detector row CT.
    Flohr TG; Stierstorfer K; Süss C; Schmidt B; Primak AN; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1712-23. PubMed ID: 17555253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Computed tomography of x-ray index of refraction using the diffraction enhanced imaging method.
    Dilmanian FA; Zhong Z; Ren B; Wu XY; Chapman LD; Orion I; Thomlinson WC
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Apr; 45(4):933-46. PubMed ID: 10795982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Spatial-resolution enhancement in computed tomography.
    Pan X; Yu L; Kao CM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Feb; 24(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 15707250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Image quality of virtual monochromatic images obtained using 320-detector row CT: A phantom study evaluating the effects of iterative reconstruction and body size.
    Okamura T; Yamada Y; Yamada M; Yamazaki A; Shiraga N; Jinzaki M
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 95():212-221. PubMed ID: 28987670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Reducing CT radiation dose with iterative reconstruction algorithms: the influence of scan and reconstruction parameters on image quality and CTDIvol.
    Klink T; Obmann V; Heverhagen J; Stork A; Adam G; Begemann P
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Sep; 83(9):1645-54. PubMed ID: 25037931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Tilted plane Feldkamp type reconstruction algorithm for spiral cone beam CT.
    Yan M; Zhang C
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3455-67. PubMed ID: 16370432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. A systematic approach towards the objective evaluation of low-contrast performance in MDCT: combination of a full-reference image fidelity metric and a software phantom.
    von Falck C; Rodt T; Waldeck S; Hartung D; Meyer B; Wacker F; Shin HO
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3166-71. PubMed ID: 22748556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Relationship between sharpness and noise in CT images reconstructed with different kernels.
    Eldevik K; Nordhøy W; Skretting A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):430-3. PubMed ID: 20181647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Comparison of analytical and algebraic 2D tomographic reconstruction approaches for irregularly sampled microCT data.
    Valton S; Bérard P; Riendeau J; Thibaudeau C; Lecomte R; Sappey-Marinier D; Peyrin F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():2916-9. PubMed ID: 18002605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.