These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3339995)
1. The role of memory in attenuations of the suffix effect. Frick RW Mem Cognit; 1988 Jan; 16(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 3339995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Suffix effects and probe modality in probed recall: implications for readout from sensory memory. Penney CG Q J Exp Psychol A; 1982 May; 34(Pt 2):245-57. PubMed ID: 7202243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Serial recall of two-voice lists: implications for theories of auditory recency and suffix effects. Greene RL Mem Cognit; 1991 Jan; 19(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 2017031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Capturing the suffix: cognitive streaming in immediate serial recall. Nicholls AP; Jones DM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):12-28. PubMed ID: 11827075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ordering and reordering in the auditory and visual modalities. Metcalfe J; Sharpe D Mem Cognit; 1985 Sep; 13(5):435-41. PubMed ID: 4088053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Recency and suffix effects as a function of auditory confusability and set size. Manning SK; Robinson II Am J Psychol; 1989; 102(4):495-510. PubMed ID: 2596615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanisms of auditory backward masking in the stimulus suffix effect. Crowder RG Psychol Rev; 1978 Nov; 85(6):502-24. PubMed ID: 734019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Lateral inhibition and echoic memory: some comments on Crowder's (1978) theory. Watkins OC; Watkins MJ Mem Cognit; 1982 May; 10(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 7121248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Release of proactive interference as a result of changing presentation modality. Kroll NE; Bee J; Gurski G J Exp Psychol; 1973 Apr; 98(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 4704204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An "across-the-board" modality effect in immediate serial recall. Routh DA Q J Exp Psychol; 1976 May; 28(2):285-304. PubMed ID: 935334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Modalities of memory: is reading lips like hearing voices? Maidment DW; Macken B; Jones DM Cognition; 2013 Dec; 129(3):471-93. PubMed ID: 24041834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Some suffix effects on lipread lists. Campbell R; Dodd B Can J Psychol; 1982 Sep; 36(3):508-14. PubMed ID: 7172134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Is there a modality effect? Evidence for visual recency and suffix effects. Battacchi MW; Pelamatti GM; Umiltà C Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):651-8. PubMed ID: 2266866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recency and suffix effects in pictures as a function of recall method. Manning SK; Schreier H Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 3364617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Suffix effects and intrusion errors in young and elderly subjects. Greenhut-Wertz J; Manning SK Exp Aging Res; 1995; 21(2):173-90. PubMed ID: 7628510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory-successive selective attention for learning disabled and normal boys. Willis WG Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Oct; 61(2):496-8. PubMed ID: 4069914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Serial position effects in simultaneous bisensory memory. Rollins HA J Exp Psychol; 1972 Jul; 94(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 5044268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]