These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3339999)

  • 1. Evidence for processing of constituent single- and multiletter codes: support for multilevel coding in word perception.
    Greenberg SN; Vellutino FR
    Mem Cognit; 1988 Jan; 16(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 3339999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition.
    Simpson GB
    Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):316-40. PubMed ID: 6385046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: evidence from orthographic similarity effects.
    Davis CJ; Bowers JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):535-57. PubMed ID: 16822123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect.
    Paap KR; Newsome SL; McDonald JE; Schvaneveldt RW
    Psychol Rev; 1982 Sep; 89(5):573-94. PubMed ID: 7178333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Memory code for verbally and film-presented action sequences].
    Riff B; Vanecek E
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1986; 138(3):185-99. PubMed ID: 3579546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint.
    Grainger J; Granier JP; Farioli F; Van Assche E; van Heuven WJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):865-84. PubMed ID: 16846285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endogenous versus exogenous attentional cuing effects on memory.
    Hauer BJ; MacLeod CM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):305-20. PubMed ID: 16458848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Knowledge of word length does not constrain word identification.
    Inhoff AW; Eiter BM
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12589445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pictorial cues and enhancement of patient recall of instructions or information.
    Reed LA; Hoffman LG
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1986 Apr; 57(4):312-5. PubMed ID: 3700955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence for processing of constituent singleand multiletter codes: Support for multilevel coding in word perception.
    Greenberg SN; Vellutino FR
    Mem Cognit; 1988 Jan; 16(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 28255828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dyslexics are impaired on implicit higher-order sequence learning, but not on implicit spatial context learning.
    Howard JH; Howard DV; Japikse KC; Eden GF
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(7):1131-44. PubMed ID: 16313930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Item and attribute storage of pictures and words in memory.
    Park DC
    Am J Psychol; 1980 Dec; 93(4):603-15. PubMed ID: 7212130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Teaching TMR children to read using integrated picture cueing.
    Worrall N; Singh Y
    Am J Ment Defic; 1983 Jan; 87(4):422-9. PubMed ID: 6829619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing.
    Brown TL; Joneleit K; Robinson CS; Brown CR
    Am J Psychol; 2002; 115(4):515-43. PubMed ID: 12516527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stroop dilution but not word-processing dilution: evidence for attention capture.
    Mitterer H; La Heij W; Van der Heijden AH
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 12589448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Hemispheric specialization, perception of and memory for words].
    Juan de Mendoza JL; Grosso D
    Annee Psychol; 1980; 80(2):367-78. PubMed ID: 7235641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coding levels in visual recognition.
    Geissler HG
    Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1979; 187(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 44403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Letter and word code interactions elicited by normally displayed words.
    Lawry JA; LaBerge D
    Percept Psychophys; 1981 Jul; 30(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 7290898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Word and picture identification: is representational parsimony possible?
    Kirsner K; Milech D; Stumpfel V
    Mem Cognit; 1986 Sep; 14(5):398-408. PubMed ID: 3773706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.