These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33400552)

  • 1. Cognitive Processing of Miscommunication in Interactive Listening: An Evaluation of Listener Indecision and Cognitive Effort.
    Roche JM; Zgonnikov A; Morett LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Jan; 64(1):159-175. PubMed ID: 33400552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expectations about the source of a speaker's accent affect accent adaptation.
    Vaughn CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 May; 145(5):3218. PubMed ID: 31153344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive Load and Listening Effort: Concepts and Age-Related Considerations.
    Lemke U; Besser J
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37 Suppl 1():77S-84S. PubMed ID: 27355774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of an aphasia ID card on the processing of language produced by a speaker with nonfluent aphasia.
    Ward CB; Mack JE
    J Commun Disord; 2022; 100():106268. PubMed ID: 36137321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does dynamic information about the speaker's face contribute to semantic speech processing? ERP evidence.
    Hernández-Gutiérrez D; Abdel Rahman R; Martín-Loeches M; Muñoz F; Schacht A; Sommer W
    Cortex; 2018 Jul; 104():12-25. PubMed ID: 29715582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Disfluency in Online Interpretation of Deception.
    Loy JE; Rohde H; Corley M
    Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6():1434-1456. PubMed ID: 27246116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SPEAKERS' AND LISTENERS' PROCESSES IN A WORD-COMMUNICATION TASK.
    ROSENBERG S; COHEN BD
    Science; 1964 Sep; 145(3637):1201-3. PubMed ID: 14173413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How Social Psychological Factors May Modulate Auditory and Cognitive Functioning During Listening.
    Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37 Suppl 1():92S-100S. PubMed ID: 27355776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory-Articulatory Neural Alignment between Listener and Speaker during Verbal Communication.
    Liu L; Zhang Y; Zhou Q; Garrett DD; Lu C; Chen A; Qiu J; Ding G
    Cereb Cortex; 2020 Mar; 30(3):942-951. PubMed ID: 31318013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporary ambiguity and memory for the context of spoken language.
    Lord K; Brown-Schmidt S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1440-1450. PubMed ID: 35355223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Desjardins JL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26809324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utilization of visual information and listener strategies in intelligibility impairment related to bilateral facial paresis.
    Keintz C
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Dec; 13(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 21682545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On how the brain decodes vocal cues about speaker confidence.
    Jiang X; Pell MD
    Cortex; 2015 May; 66():9-34. PubMed ID: 25796072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fixating the eyes of a speaker provides sufficient visual information to modulate early auditory processing.
    Kaplan E; Jesse A
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Sep; 146():107724. PubMed ID: 31323242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.
    Walshe M; Miller N; Leahy M; Murray A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(6):633-48. PubMed ID: 18608608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive function predicts listening effort performance during complex tasks in normally aging adults.
    Harvey J; von Hapsburg D; Seeman S
    Noise Health; 2017; 19(91):254-262. PubMed ID: 29319009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.