These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33400896)

  • 1. Predicting the Ease of Human Category Learning Using Radial Basis Function Networks.
    Roads BD; Mozer MC
    Neural Comput; 2021 Feb; 33(2):376-397. PubMed ID: 33400896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison processes in category learning: from theory to behavior.
    Hammer R; Bar-Hillel A; Hertz T; Weinshall D; Hochstein S
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1225():102-18. PubMed ID: 18614160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are there representational shifts during category learning?
    Johansen MK; Palmeri TJ
    Cogn Psychol; 2002 Dec; 45(4):482-553. PubMed ID: 12480477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules.
    Nosofsky RM; Kruschke JK; McKinley SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Mar; 18(2):211-33. PubMed ID: 1532819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The neural basis of perceptual category learning in human infants.
    Grossmann T; Gliga T; Johnson MH; Mareschal D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2276-86. PubMed ID: 19199422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stages of abstraction and exemplar memorization in pigeon category learning.
    Cook RG; Smith JD
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1059-67. PubMed ID: 17201788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revisiting the linear separability constraint: New implications for theories of human category learning.
    Levering KR; Conaway N; Kurtz KJ
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Apr; 48(3):335-347. PubMed ID: 31429047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Category structure determines the relative attractiveness of global versus local averages.
    Vogel T; Carr EW; Davis T; Winkielman P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Feb; 44(2):250-267. PubMed ID: 28933894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tests of an exemplar-memory model of classification learning in a high-dimensional natural-science category domain.
    Nosofsky RM; Sanders CA; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Mar; 147(3):328-353. PubMed ID: 29058939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning.
    Smith JD; Minda JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):800-11. PubMed ID: 12109770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Training set coherence and set size effects on concept generalization and recognition.
    Bowman CR; Zeithamova D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1442-1464. PubMed ID: 32105147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of category representations on exemplar generation.
    Wang M; Xie L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(9):1851-60. PubMed ID: 26275023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The learning of basic-level categories by pigeons: the prototype effect, attention, and effects of categorization.
    Jitsumori M; Ohkita M; Ushitani T
    Learn Behav; 2011 Sep; 39(3):271-87. PubMed ID: 21484235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metacognitive monitoring during category learning: how success affects future behaviour.
    Doyle ME; Hourihan KL
    Memory; 2016 Oct; 24(9):1197-207. PubMed ID: 26377626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Post-training flexibility in category learning.
    Yang LX; Chiang PA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Aug; 31(4):1833-1842. PubMed ID: 38315277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Out of sight, out of mind: Categorization learning and normal aging.
    Schenk S; Minda JP; Lech RK; Suchan B
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():222-233. PubMed ID: 27534998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Similar to the category, but not the exemplars: A study of generalization.
    Conaway N; Kurtz KJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1312-1323. PubMed ID: 27981437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting transfer performance: a comparison of competing function learning models.
    McDaniel MA; Dimperio E; Griego JA; Busemeyer JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):173-95. PubMed ID: 19210089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exemplar similarity and rule application.
    Hahn U; Prat-Sala M; Pothos EM; Brumby DP
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 19815187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Category learning from equivalence constraints.
    Hammer R; Hertz T; Hochstein S; Weinshall D
    Cogn Process; 2009 Aug; 10(3):211-32. PubMed ID: 19050949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.