These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Performance of laboratory tests for detection for Clostridioides difficile: A multicenter prospective study in Japan. Senoh M; Kato H; Honda H; Fukuda T; Tagashira Y; Horiuchi H; Chiba H; Suzuki D; Hosokawa N; Kitazono H; Norisue Y; Kume H; Mori N; Morikawa H; Kashiwagura S; Higuchi A; Kato H; Nakamura M; Ishiguro S; Morita S; Ishikawa H; Watanabe T; Kojima K; Yokomaku I; Bando T; Toimoto K; Moriya K; Kasahara K; Kitada S; Ogawa J; Saito H; Tominaga H; Shimizu Y; Masumoto F; Tadera K; Yoshida J; Kikuchi T; Yoshikawa I; Watanabe T; Honda M; Yokote K; Toyokawa T; Miyazato H; Nakama M; Mahe C; Reske K; Olsen MA; Dubberke ER Anaerobe; 2019 Dec; 60():102107. PubMed ID: 31647977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms. Novak-Weekley SM; Marlowe EM; Miller JM; Cumpio J; Nomura JH; Vance PH; Weissfeld A J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Mar; 48(3):889-93. PubMed ID: 20071552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Superiority of the DNA amplification assay for the diagnosis of C. difficile infection: a clinical comparison of fecal tests. Barkin JA; Nandi N; Miller N; Grace A; Barkin JS; Sussman DA Dig Dis Sci; 2012 Oct; 57(10):2592-9. PubMed ID: 22576711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Latent Class Analysis for the Diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile Infection. Doolan CP; Louie T; Lata C; Larios OE; Stokes W; Kim J; Brown K; Beck P; Deardon R; Pillai DR Clin Infect Dis; 2021 Nov; 73(9):e2673-e2679. PubMed ID: 33053174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective Evaluation of the mariPOC Test for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxins A/B. Savolainen R; Koskinen JM; Mentula S; Koskinen JO; Kaukoranta SS J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 58(4):. PubMed ID: 31941691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical outcomes and treatment necessity in patients with toxin-negative Clostridioides difficile stool samples. Cho DH; Kim SH; Jeon CH; Kim HT; Park KJ; Kim J; Kwak J; Kwan BS; Kong S; Lee JW; Kim KM; Wi YM Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob; 2024 Apr; 23(1):35. PubMed ID: 38664689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sequential introduction of a multistep testing algorithm and nucleic acid amplification testing leading to an increase in Skinner AM; Yu B; Cheknis A; Pacheco SM; Gerding DN; Johnson S Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 41(10):1148-1153. PubMed ID: 32576334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimizing laboratory workflow for the diagnosis of Clostridiodes difficile infection in a medical center in Northern Taiwan. Chang FC; Liu CP; Sun FJ; Lin CC J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2021 Apr; 54(2):284-289. PubMed ID: 31624018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of toxigenic Clostridioides [Clostridium] difficile: Usefulness of two commercially available enzyme immunoassays and a PCR assay on stool samples and stool isolates. Legaria MC; Rollet R; Di Martino A; Castello L; Barberis C; Rossetti MA; Guardati MC; Fernández Canigia L; Carloni G; Litterio M; Rocchi M; Anchart EG; Trejo FM; Minnaard J; Klajn D; Predari SC Rev Argent Microbiol; 2018; 50(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 28988901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High Agreement Between an Ultrasensitive Clostridioides difficile Toxin Assay and a C. difficile Laboratory Algorithm Utilizing GDH-and-Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays and Cytotoxin Testing. Landry ML; Topal JE; Estis J; Katzenbach P; Nolan N; Sandlund J J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Jan; 58(2):. PubMed ID: 31776192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of Clostridioides difficile Infection-Related Complications and Treatment Patterns among Nucleic Acid Amplification Test-Positive/Toxin Enzyme Immunoassay-Negative Patients. Miller R; Morillas JA; Brizendine KD; Fraser TG J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Feb; 58(3):. PubMed ID: 31896665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Four Common Diagnostic Methods for Clostridioides difficile Infection. Xuan S; Zangwill KM; Ni W; Ma J; Hay JW J Gen Intern Med; 2020 Apr; 35(4):1102-1110. PubMed ID: 32016703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Significance of a polymerase chain reaction method in the detection of Clostridioides difficile. Jaqueti Aroca J; Molina Esteban LM; García-Arata I; García-Martínez J; Cano De Torres I; Prieto Menchero S Rev Esp Quimioter; 2021 Apr; 34(2):141-144. PubMed ID: 33601876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of the introduction of nucleic acid amplification testing on Clostridioides difficile detection and ribotype distribution in Wales. Perry MD; White PL; Morris TE Anaerobe; 2021 Feb; 67():102313. PubMed ID: 33309680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of Clostridium difficile toxin enzyme immunoassay and nucleic acid amplification tests stratified by patient disease severity. Humphries RM; Uslan DZ; Rubin Z J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Mar; 51(3):869-73. PubMed ID: 23269736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A 2-step algorithm combining glutamate dehydrogenase and nucleic acid amplification tests for the detection of Clostridioides difficile in stool specimens. Liu C; Tang C; Han Y; Xu Y; Ni F; Jin K; Liu G Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2021 Feb; 40(2):345-351. PubMed ID: 32944896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two-step glutamate dehydrogenase antigen real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile. Goldenberg SD; Cliff PR; Smith S; Milner M; French GL J Hosp Infect; 2010 Jan; 74(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 19900734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection in symptomatic patients: what can we do better? Maestri AC; Nogueira KS; Mialski R; Dos Santos EM; Kraft L; Raboni SM Braz J Microbiol; 2023 Jun; 54(2):849-857. PubMed ID: 36991280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]