These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33402848)

  • 1. Comparisons of Therapeutic and Aesthetic Effects of One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with and without Biological Matrix.
    Gao P; Wang Z; Kong X; Wang X; Fang Y; Wang J
    Cancer Manag Res; 2020; 12():13381-13392. PubMed ID: 33402848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biological Matrix-Assisted One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications.
    Gao P; Bai P; Ren Y; Kong X; Wang Z; Fang Y; Wang J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Dec; 45(6):2581-2590. PubMed ID: 34350500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
    Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications Following Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison Between Biological Matrix-Assisted Direct-to-Implant and Latissimus Dorsi Flap.
    Gao P; Bai P; Kong X; Fang Y; Gao J; Wang J
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():766076. PubMed ID: 35155227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without biological or synthetic mesh.
    Sewart E; Turner NL; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Skillman J; Whisker L; Thrush S; Barnes N; Holcombe C; Potter S;
    BJS Open; 2021 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 33609398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
    Dikmans RE; Negenborn VL; Bouman MB; Winters HA; Twisk JW; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MA; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NA; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RR; Ritt MJ; Mullender MG
    Lancet Oncol; 2017 Feb; 18(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 28012977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acellular bovine pericardium matrix in immediate breast reconstruction compared with conventional implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Wang S; He S; Zhang X; Sun J; Huang Q; Liu J; Han C; Yin Z; Ding B; Yin J
    JPRAS Open; 2021 Sep; 29():1-9. PubMed ID: 33937472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short-term cost-effectiveness of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage expander-implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
    Negenborn VL; Smit JM; Dikmans REG; Winters HAH; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NAS; van Steveninck-Barends JM; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
    Br J Surg; 2019 Apr; 106(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 30835827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy With and Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Among Women With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Johansson H; Roy PG; Brandberg Y; Frisell J
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Oct; 4(10):e2127806. PubMed ID: 34596671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient-reported Outcomes after ADM-assisted Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Cross-sectional Study.
    Negenborn VL; Dikmans REG; Bouman MB; Wilschut JA; Mullender MG; Salzberg CA
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2018 Feb; 6(2):e1654. PubMed ID: 29616167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: Higher complication rate vs cosmetic benefits.
    Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Leser C; Salama M; Singer CF
    Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):957-964. PubMed ID: 30230119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Current practice of implant-based breast reconstruction: results from China national practice questionnaire survey].
    Guo R; Xiu BQ; Su YH; Wang J; Zhang Q; Chi WR; Li L; Yang BL; Zhang YY; Cao AY; Shao ZM; Wu J
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 57(8):616-621. PubMed ID: 31422632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A propensity score-matched comparison of recurrence outcomes after immediate implant vs autologous flap reconstruction in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
    Wu ZY; Han HH; Kim HJ; Lee JW; Chung IY; Kim J; Lee SB; Son BH; Eom JS; Jung JH; Kim SB; Gong G; Kim HH; Ahn S-; Ko B
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Jun; 187(2):417-425. PubMed ID: 33740204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction.
    Caputo GG; Zingaretti N; Kiprianidis I; Zanfisi C; Domenici L; Parodi PC; Governa M
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 33308993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Alone or in Combination with a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh - A Detailed Analysis of the BREAST-Q and Overview of the Literature.
    Dieterich M; Angres J; Stubert J; Stachs A; Reimer T; Gerber B
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 2015 Jul; 75(7):692-701. PubMed ID: 26257406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immediate-implant-based-breast-reconstruction with two-stage expander-implant reconstruction versus one-stage-reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: analysis of patients' satisfaction.
    Innocenti A; Melita D; Affortunati M; Susini T; Innocenti M
    Acta Biomed; 2021 Jul; 92(3):e2021228. PubMed ID: 34212931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prepectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix: Do We See a Difference?
    Manrique OJ; Huang TC; Martinez-Jorge J; Ciudad P; Forte AJ; Bustos SS; Boughey JC; Jakub JW; Degnim AC; Galan R
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Feb; 145(2):263e-272e. PubMed ID: 31985613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A direct comparison of porcine (Strattice™) and bovine (Surgimend™) acellular dermal matrices in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.
    Ball JF; Sheena Y; Tarek Saleh DM; Forouhi P; Benyon SL; Irwin MS; Malata CM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1076-1082. PubMed ID: 28624524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. BROWSE: A multicentre comparison of nine year outcomes in acellular dermal matrix based and complete submuscular implant-based immediate breast reconstruction-aesthetics, capsular contracture and patient reported outcomes.
    Wilson RL; Kirwan CC; O'Donoghue JM; Linforth RA; Johnson RK; Harvey JR
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jan; 48(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 34836730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix.
    Vardanian AJ; Clayton JL; Roostaeian J; Shirvanian V; Da Lio A; Lipa JE; Crisera C; Festekjian JH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Nov; 128(5):403e-410e. PubMed ID: 22030500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.