These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33403510)

  • 1. Evaluation of peak skin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: relationship with fluoroscopic pulse rate and target vessel.
    Tanaka T; Matsubara K; Kobayashi S
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2021 Mar; 14(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 33403510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Indicators of the maximum radiation dose to the skin during percutaneous coronary intervention in different target vessels.
    Chida K; Saito H; Kagaya Y; Kohzuki M; Takai Y; Takahashi S; Yamada S; Zuguchi M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Aug; 68(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 16830342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Multicenter Evaluation of Cine Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography Dose Rate for Various Angiography Programs: Comparison with Fluoroscopic Dose Rate].
    Takeda K; Hayashi T; Sakiyama K; Hasegawa R; Watanabe Y; Tajima O; Tsukamoto A; Sato H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(7):718-725. PubMed ID: 34305058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fluoroscopy pulse rate reduction during diagnostic and therapeutic imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: An evaluation of radiation dose, procedure complications and outcomes.
    Hansen JW; Foy A; Schmidt T; Ghahramani M; Chambers CE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 89(4):665-670. PubMed ID: 27121130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship of beam angulation and radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Agarwal S; Parashar A; Bajaj NS; Khan I; Ahmad I; Heupler FA; Bunte M; Modi DK; Tuzcu EM; Kapadia SR
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):558-66. PubMed ID: 24746652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On-line estimated peak skin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion using new patient dose mapping technology.
    Lefèvre T; Mangiameli A; Hovasse T; Louvard Y; Benamer H; Garot P; Unterseeh T; Champagne S; Tavolaro O; Amelot S; Chevalier B
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2022; 115(8-9):436-447. PubMed ID: 35840491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of radiation dose reduction due to real-time monitoring and visualization of peak skin dose during coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Ichimoto E; Kadohira T; Nakayama T; De Gregorio J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 91(4):717-722. PubMed ID: 28557313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgeon education decreases radiation dose in complex endovascular procedures and improves patient safety.
    Kirkwood ML; Arbique GM; Guild JB; Timaran C; Chung J; Anderson JA; Valentine RJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2013 Sep; 58(3):715-21. PubMed ID: 23688628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effect of Reducing Fluoroscopy Pulse Rates on Visibility of Devices and Radiation Dose in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention].
    Yoshida M; Niwa M; Takahashi Y; Kuratani Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2024 May; 80(5):519-529. PubMed ID: 38569842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions.
    Abdelaal E; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Arsenault J; Rimac G; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Larose E; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Allende R; Ribeiro H; Costerousse O; Mongrain R; Bertrand OF;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):567-74. PubMed ID: 24746649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient exposure to X-rays during coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention: results of a multicenter national survey.
    Georges JL; Belle L; Ricard C; Cattan S; Albert F; Hirsch JL; Monsegu J; Dibie A; Khalife K; Caussin C; Maccia C; Livarek B; Hanssen M;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Apr; 83(5):729-38. PubMed ID: 24323486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation exposure to patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: are current reference values too high?
    Kuon E; Empen K; Rohde D; Dahm JB
    Herz; 2004 Mar; 29(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 15054590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Novel radiation dose reduction fluoroscopic technology facilitates chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions.
    Balter S; Brinkman M; Kalra S; Nazif T; Parikh M; Kirtane AJ; Moses J; Leon M; Feri A; Green P; Ali ZA; Liao M; Karmpaliotis D
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Dec; 13(12):e1468-e1474. PubMed ID: 28741573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Multicenter Survey on Radiation Dose of Cardiac Intervention].
    Hayashi T; Watanabe Y; Imazeki M; Takeda K; Sakiyama K; Hasegawa R; Tajima O; Tsukamoto A; Sato H; Shiraki H; Abe O
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2020; 76(7):715-724. PubMed ID: 32684564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Presence of sigma shaped right coronary artery is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with inferior myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Güngör B; Alper AT; Ozcan KS; Ekmekçi A; Karadeniz FÖ; Mutluer FO; Kaya A; Karataş B; Osmonov D; Bolca O
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Nov; 84(6):965-72. PubMed ID: 24402881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of Low-Dose Compared With Standard-Dose Radiation for Cardiac Catheterization and Intervention (KAR RAD Study).
    Kar S; Teleb M; Albaghdadi A; Ibrahim A; Mukherjee D
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 31(6):187-194. PubMed ID: 30865914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Establishing a priori and a posteriori predictive models to assess patients' peak skin dose in interventional cardiology. Part 2: results of the VERIDIC project.
    Feghali JA; Delépierre J; Belac OC; Dabin J; Deleu M; De Monte F; Dobric M; Gallagher A; Hadid-Beurrier L; Henry P; Hršak H; Kiernan T; Kumar R; Knežević Ž; Maccia C; Majer M; Malchair F; Noble S; Obrad D; Merce MS; Sideris G; Simantirakis G; Spaulding C; Tarantini G; Van Ngoc Ty C
    Acta Radiol; 2023 Jan; 64(1):125-138. PubMed ID: 34935520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods to reduce patients' maximum skin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion.
    Suzuki S; Furui S; Isshiki T; Kozuma K; Koyama Y; Ochiai M; Asakura Y
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 May; 71(6):792-8. PubMed ID: 18324699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measures to reduce radiation in a modern cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Agarwal S; Parashar A; Ellis SG; Heupler FA; Lau E; Tuzcu EM; Kapadia SR
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(4):447-55. PubMed ID: 25097198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of fluoroscopic cases qualifying as potential fluoroscopic sentinel events.
    Weinberg BD; Vance A; Arbique GM; Guild JB; Anderson J; Chason DP
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Apr; 20(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 23498987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.