These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33403883)
1. Accuracy of Finnish Cancer Registry colorectal cancer data: a comparison between registry data and clinical records. Lunkka P; Malila N; Ryynänen H; Heikkinen S; Sallinen V; Koskenvuo L Scand J Gastroenterol; 2021 Mar; 56(3):247-251. PubMed ID: 33403883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gastric cancer completeness in Finnish Cancer Registry and Finnish Patient Registry: a population-based nationwide retrospective cohort study. Maharjan U; Kauppila JH BMJ Open; 2022 Apr; 12(4):e056320. PubMed ID: 35440454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term survival among colorectal cancer patients in Finland, 1991-2015: a nationwide population-based registry study. Olenius T; Koskenvuo L; Koskensalo S; Lepistö A; Böckelman C BMC Cancer; 2022 Apr; 22(1):356. PubMed ID: 35366835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coverage and accuracy of myeloproliferative and myelodysplastic neoplasms in the Finnish Cancer Registry. Leinonen MK; Rantanen M; Pitkäniemi J; Malila N Acta Oncol; 2016 Jun; 55(6):782-6. PubMed ID: 26767306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality measures of the population-based Finnish Cancer Registry indicate sound data quality for solid malignant tumours. Leinonen MK; Miettinen J; Heikkinen S; Pitkäniemi J; Malila N Eur J Cancer; 2017 May; 77():31-39. PubMed ID: 28350996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Finnish Cancer Registry as follow-up source of a large trial cohort--accuracy and delay. Korhonen P; Malila N; Pukkala E; Teppo L; Albanes D; Virtamo J Acta Oncol; 2002; 41(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 12234031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Completeness and accuracy of registration of colorectal cancer in Finland. Kyllönen LE; Teppo L; Lehtonen M Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1987; 76(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 3434988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating the number of colorectal cancer patients treated with anti-tumour therapy in 2015: the analysis of the Czech National Cancer Registry. Pavlík T; Májek O; Mužík J; Koptíková J; Slavíček L; Fínek J; Feltl D; Vyzula R; Dušek L BMC Public Health; 2012 Feb; 12():117. PubMed ID: 22325812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy and Coverage of Diagnosis and Procedural Coding of Severely Injured Patients in the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register: Comparison to Patient Files and the Helsinki Trauma Registry. Heinänen M; Brinck T; Handolin L; Mattila VM; Söderlund T Scand J Surg; 2017 Sep; 106(3):269-277. PubMed ID: 28537212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Annual disease burden due to human papillomavirus (HPV) 6 and 11 infections in Finland. Syrjänen KJ Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 2009; 107():3-32. PubMed ID: 19408160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of diagnosis codes to identify side of colon in an electronic health record registry. Luhn P; Kuk D; Carrigan G; Nussbaum N; Sorg R; Rohrer R; Tucker MG; Arnieri B; Taylor MD; Meropol NJ BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):177. PubMed ID: 31426736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of incident breast and colorectal cancer cases from an administrative healthcare database in Catalonia, Spain. Escribà JM; Banqué M; Macià F; Gálvez J; Esteban L; Pareja L; Clèries R; Sanz X; Castells X; Borrás JM; Ribes J Clin Transl Oncol; 2020 Jun; 22(6):943-952. PubMed ID: 31586294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spillover improved survival in non-invited patients of the colorectal cancer screening programme. Miettinen J; Malila N; Hakama M; Pitkäniemi J J Med Screen; 2018 Sep; 25(3):134-140. PubMed ID: 28782403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The completeness and accuracy of the Norwegian Female Incontinence Registry. Dyrkorn OA; Staff AC; Kulseng-Hanssen S; Dimoski T; Svenningsen R Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Dec; 99(12):1618-1625. PubMed ID: 32640493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Piloting gender-oriented colorectal cancer screening with a faecal immunochemical test: population-based registry study from Finland. Sarkeala T; Färkkilä M; Anttila A; Hyöty M; Kairaluoma M; Rautio T; Voutilainen M; Helander S; Jäntti M; Lehtinen M; Patrikka L; Malila N; Heinävaara S BMJ Open; 2021 Feb; 11(2):e046667. PubMed ID: 33558363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Structured Approach for Evaluating Strategies for Cancer Ascertainment Using Large-Scale Electronic Health Record Data. Earles A; Liu L; Bustamante R; Coke P; Lynch J; Messer K; Martínez ME; Murphy JD; Williams CD; Fisher DA; Provenzale DT; Gawron AJ; Kaltenbach T; Gupta S JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2018 Dec; 2():1-12. PubMed ID: 30652546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Occurrence and characteristics of faecal immunochemical screen-detected cancers vs non-screen-detected cancers: Results from a Flemish colorectal cancer screening programme. van de Veerdonk W; Hoeck S; Peeters M; Van Hal G; Francart J; De Brabander I United European Gastroenterol J; 2020 Mar; 8(2):185-194. PubMed ID: 32213071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Agreement between the Danish Cancer Registry and the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group Database. Christensen J; Højsgaard Schmidt LK; Kejs AMT; Søgaard J; Rasted MC; Andersen O; Ingeholm P; Iversen LH Acta Oncol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):116-123. PubMed ID: 31559881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]