These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33404162)

  • 1. Suppression gene drive in continuous space can result in unstable persistence of both drive and wild-type alleles.
    Champer J; Kim IK; Champer SE; Clark AG; Messer PW
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Feb; 30(4):1086-1101. PubMed ID: 33404162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gene drives for invasive wasp control: Extinction is unlikely, with suppression dependent on dispersal and growth rates.
    Lester PJ; O'Sullivan D; Perry GLW
    Ecol Appl; 2023 Oct; 33(7):e2912. PubMed ID: 37615220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulations Reveal High Efficiency and Confinement of a Population Suppression CRISPR Toxin-Antidote Gene Drive.
    Zhu Y; Champer J
    ACS Synth Biol; 2023 Mar; 12(3):809-819. PubMed ID: 36825354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Making waves: Comparative analysis of gene drive spread characteristics in a continuous space model.
    Pan M; Champer J
    Mol Ecol; 2023 Oct; 32(20):5673-5694. PubMed ID: 37694511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ecological effects on underdominance threshold drives for vector control.
    Khamis D; El Mouden C; Kura K; Bonsall MB
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Nov; 456():1-15. PubMed ID: 30040965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adversarial interspecies relationships facilitate population suppression by gene drive in spatially explicit models.
    Liu Y; Teo W; Yang H; Champer J
    Ecol Lett; 2023 Jul; 26(7):1174-1185. PubMed ID: 37162099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incorporating ecology into gene drive modelling.
    Kim J; Harris KD; Kim IK; Shemesh S; Messer PW; Greenbaum G
    Ecol Lett; 2023 Sep; 26 Suppl 1():S62-S80. PubMed ID: 37840022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Population Dynamics of Underdominance Gene Drive Systems in Continuous Space.
    Champer J; Zhao J; Champer SE; Liu J; Messer PW
    ACS Synth Biol; 2020 Apr; 9(4):779-792. PubMed ID: 32142612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Slow and steady wins the race: Spatial and stochastic processes and the failure of suppression gene drives.
    Paril JF; Phillips BL
    Mol Ecol; 2022 Sep; 31(17):4451-4464. PubMed ID: 35790043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gene drives for vertebrate pest control: Realistic spatial modelling of eradication probabilities and times for island mouse populations.
    Birand A; Cassey P; Ross JV; Russell JC; Thomas P; Prowse TAA
    Mol Ecol; 2022 Mar; 31(6):1907-1923. PubMed ID: 35073448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modelling homing suppression gene drive in haplodiploid organisms.
    Liu Y; Champer J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Apr; 289(1972):20220320. PubMed ID: 35414240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Population dynamics of engineered underdominance and killer-rescue gene drives in the control of disease vectors.
    Edgington MP; Alphey LS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Mar; 14(3):e1006059. PubMed ID: 29570717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modelling daisy quorum drive: A short-term bridge across engineered fitness valleys.
    de Haas FJH; Kläy L; Débarre F; Otto SP
    PLoS Genet; 2024 May; 20(5):e1011262. PubMed ID: 38753875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance characteristics allow for confinement of a CRISPR toxin-antidote gene drive for population suppression in a reaction-diffusion model.
    Zhang S; Champer J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2024 Jun; 291(2025):20240500. PubMed ID: 38889790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gene drives for the extinction of wild metapopulations.
    Olejarz JW; Nowak MA
    J Theor Biol; 2024 Jan; 577():111654. PubMed ID: 37984587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gene drives and population persistence vs elimination: The impact of spatial structure and inbreeding at low density.
    Beaghton PJ; Burt A
    Theor Popul Biol; 2022 Jun; 145():109-125. PubMed ID: 35247370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resistance to natural and synthetic gene drive systems.
    Price TAR; Windbichler N; Unckless RL; Sutter A; Runge JN; Ross PA; Pomiankowski A; Nuckolls NL; Montchamp-Moreau C; Mideo N; Martin OY; Manser A; Legros M; Larracuente AM; Holman L; Godwin J; Gemmell N; Courret C; Buchman A; Barrett LG; Lindholm AK
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Oct; 33(10):1345-1360. PubMed ID: 32969551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rescue by gene swamping as a gene drive deployment strategy.
    Harris KD; Greenbaum G
    Cell Rep; 2023 Dec; 42(12):113499. PubMed ID: 38039130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    Champer SE; Kim IK; Clark AG; Messer PW; Champer J
    Elife; 2022 Oct; 11():. PubMed ID: 36239372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance analysis of novel toxin-antidote CRISPR gene drive systems.
    Champer J; Kim IK; Champer SE; Clark AG; Messer PW
    BMC Biol; 2020 Mar; 18(1):27. PubMed ID: 32164660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.