These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33404299)
41. Is gun control really about people control? Ausman JI; Faria MA Surg Neurol Int; 2019; 10():195. PubMed ID: 31637096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The United States Supreme Court and psychiatry in the 1990s. Ciccone JR Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 22(1):197-211. PubMed ID: 10083955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. COVID-19 Emergency Restrictions on Firearms. Kuhn SA J Law Med Ethics; 2020 Dec; 48(4_suppl):119-125. PubMed ID: 33404296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Impact of California firearms sales laws and dealer regulations on the illegal diversion of guns. Pierce GL; Braga AA; Wintemute GJ Inj Prev; 2015 Jun; 21(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 25472991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The right to die and the jurisprudence of tradition. McConnell MW Utah Law Rev; 1997; 665(3):665-708. PubMed ID: 11657527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation. Destro RA Hum Life Rev; 1994; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Patients and Guns: Florida Physicians Are Not Asking. Hagen MG; Carew B; Crandall M; Zaidi Z South Med J; 2019 Nov; 112(11):581-585. PubMed ID: 31682739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. When the First Amendment and public health collide: the Court's increasingly strict constitutional scrutiny of health regulations that restrict commercial speech. Rauer S Am J Law Med; 2012; 38(4):690-712. PubMed ID: 23356100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Temporal association between federal gun laws and the diversion of guns to criminals in Milwaukee. Webster DW; Vernick JS; Bulzacchelli MT; Vittes KA J Urban Health; 2012 Feb; 89(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 22218834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Not an 'iron pipeline', but many capillaries: regulating passive transactions in Los Angeles' secondary, illegal gun market. Chesnut KY; Barragan M; Gravel J; Pifer NA; Reiter K; Sherman N; Tita GE Inj Prev; 2017 Aug; 23(4):226-231. PubMed ID: 27758829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The Title X family planning gag rule: can the government buy up constitutional rights? Chervin CI Stanford Law Rev; 1989 Jan; 41(2):401-34. PubMed ID: 11655926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Effects of policies designed to keep firearms from high-risk individuals. Webster DW; Wintemute GJ Annu Rev Public Health; 2015 Mar; 36():21-37. PubMed ID: 25581152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Government funding in Title X projects: circumscribing the constitutional rights of the indigent: Rust v. Sullivan. Maher L Calif West Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):143-82. PubMed ID: 11656260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Conceptual and Scientific Defects in the Supreme Court's "Method of Execution" Jurisprudence. Dow DR; Newberry JR Yale J Biol Med; 2019 Dec; 92(4):793-803. PubMed ID: 31866796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Jacobson v Massachusetts: it's not your great-great-grandfather's public health law. Mariner WK; Annas GJ; Glantz LH Am J Public Health; 2005 Apr; 95(4):581-90. PubMed ID: 15798113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Abortion and the Supreme Court: why legislative motive matters. Glantz LH Am J Public Health; 1986 Dec; 76(12):1452-5. PubMed ID: 3777296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Support for new policies to regulate firearms. Results of two national surveys. Teret SP; Webster DW; Vernick JS; Smith TW; Leff D; Wintemute GJ; Cook PJ; Hawkins DF; Kellermann AL; Sorenson SB; DeFrancesco S N Engl J Med; 1998 Sep; 339(12):813-8. PubMed ID: 9738090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]