These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33405119)

  • 1. Sustainability assessment of existing onshore wind plants in the context of triple bottom line: a best-worst method (BWM) based MCDM framework.
    Ecer F
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(16):19677-19693. PubMed ID: 33405119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating renewable energy sources for implementing the hydrogen economy in Pakistan: a two-stage fuzzy MCDM approach.
    Xu L; Shah SAA; Zameer H; Solangi YA
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(32):33202-33215. PubMed ID: 31520388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selection of renewable energy systems sites using the MaxEnt model in the Eastern Mediterranean region in Turkey.
    Tekin S; Guner ED; Cilek A; Unal Cilek M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(37):51405-51424. PubMed ID: 33983608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of renewable energy policies in Turkey with sectoral electricity demand forecasting.
    Soğukpınar F; Erkal G; Özer H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(13):35891-35912. PubMed ID: 36538230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MCDM analysis of wind energy in Turkey: decision making based on environmental impact.
    Değirmenci S; Bingöl F; Sofuoglu SC
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jul; 25(20):19753-19766. PubMed ID: 29736652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Present Situation of Wind Turbine in Major European Countries and Outlook of Wind Turbine in Japan].
    Morimatsu Y
    Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2018; 73(3):278-283. PubMed ID: 30270294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The evaluation of renewable energy alternatives in Turkey using intuitionistic-fuzzy EDAS methodology.
    Dumrul C; Bilgili F; Zarali F; Dumrul Y; Kiliçarslan Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Feb; 31(10):15503-15524. PubMed ID: 38296924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the environmental sustainability of electricity generation in Chile.
    Gaete-Morales C; Gallego-Schmid A; Stamford L; Azapagic A
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Sep; 636():1155-1170. PubMed ID: 29913578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multi-criteria of wind-solar site selection problem using a GIS-AHP-based approach with an application in Igdir Province/Turkey.
    Koc A; Turk S; Şahin G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(31):32298-32310. PubMed ID: 31598925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of the suitable sites for constructing solar photovoltaic (PV) power plants in Kayseri, Turkey using GIS-based ranking and AHP methods.
    Günen MA
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(40):57232-57247. PubMed ID: 34089160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Potential impacts of climate change on renewable energy in Egypt.
    Hassaan MA; Abdrabo MAKA; Hussein HA; Ghanem AAA; Abdel-Latif H
    Environ Monit Assess; 2024 Feb; 196(3):268. PubMed ID: 38356032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A GIS-based multi-criteria model for offshore wind energy power plants site selection in both sides of the Aegean Sea.
    Tercan E; Tapkın S; Latinopoulos D; Dereli MA; Tsiropoulos A; Ak MF
    Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Sep; 192(10):652. PubMed ID: 32964332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of improved fuzzy best worst analytic hierarchy process on renewable energy.
    Majumder P; Balas VE; Paul A; Baidya D
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2021; 7():e453. PubMed ID: 33954237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefit Modeling and Analysis of Wind Power Generation under Social Energy Economy and Public Health.
    Liu Y; Abdul Karim Z; Khalid N; Said FF
    J Environ Public Health; 2022; 2022():5635853. PubMed ID: 35719856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of electric generation capacity by renewable and non-renewable energy in Brazilian economic growth.
    de Oliveira Noronha M; Zanini RR; Souza AM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(32):33236-33259. PubMed ID: 31515770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Offshore wind power station (OWPS) site selection using a two-stage MCDM-based spherical fuzzy set approach.
    Wang CN; Nguyen NA; Dang TT
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):4260. PubMed ID: 35277582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Considerations on environmental, economic, and energy impacts of wind energy generation: Projections towards sustainability initiatives.
    Msigwa G; Ighalo JO; Yap PS
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Nov; 849():157755. PubMed ID: 35921924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economical and environmental impacts of decarbonisation of Indonesian power sector.
    Indra Al Irsyad M; Halog A; Nepal R; Koesrindartoto DP
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Apr; 259():109669. PubMed ID: 32072944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An integrated multi-criteria decision-making framework under uncertainty for evaluating sustainable hydrogen production strategies based on renewable energies in Iran.
    Hosseini Dehshiri SJ; Amiri M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(16):46058-46073. PubMed ID: 36710312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wind speed pattern data and wind energy potential in Pakistan: current status, challenging platforms and innovative prospects.
    Saulat H; Khan MM; Aslam M; Chawla M; Rafiq S; Zafar F; Khan MM; Bokhari A; Jamil F; Bhutto AW; Bazmi AA
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jul; 28(26):34051-34073. PubMed ID: 33119799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.